2013
DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.a3381
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simple fMRI Postprocessing Suffices for Normal Clinical Practice

Abstract: BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE:Whereas fMRI postprocessing tools used in research are accurate but unwieldy, those used for clinical practice are user-friendly but are less accurate. We aimed to determine whether commercial software for fMRI postprocessing is accurate enough for clinical practice.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, professionals who use SPM or FSL clinically are responsible for the integrity of the product used (e.g., correct designation of right and left). Previous studies comparing MR scanner manufacturer software and SPM found a significant concordance between the two with respect to the area and the intensity of activation confirming that manufacturer software provide adequate and clinically relevant information for patient management [29,30].…”
Section: Data Post-processing Protocol and Reportingmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Therefore, professionals who use SPM or FSL clinically are responsible for the integrity of the product used (e.g., correct designation of right and left). Previous studies comparing MR scanner manufacturer software and SPM found a significant concordance between the two with respect to the area and the intensity of activation confirming that manufacturer software provide adequate and clinically relevant information for patient management [29,30].…”
Section: Data Post-processing Protocol and Reportingmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Gonzalez-Ortiz et al 16 showed that built-in scanner analysis software was often sufficient for presurgical mapping, but third party packages offered superior flexibility, reduced noise and was preferred by radiologists. However, they were unable to provide quantitative guidelines for determining the best pipeline for a given fMRI data set.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%