1991
DOI: 10.1049/el:19910187
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simple measurement of carrier induced refractive-index change in InGaAsP pin ridge waveguide structures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…10 The induced reflectance error can be calculated by ⌬R =4͑n r −1͒ / ͑n r +1͒ 3 ⌬n r ; a typical In-GaAsP QW high-bias carrier concentration of 2 ϫ 10 18 cm −3 will yield a refractive index variation ⌬n r of −0.02 and ⌬R / R = −0.008. 9,11 At I = 6 A, we measure ⌬R / R to be approximately 0.0058 in the QW region for the SCOWL and use this as a typical value. Accounting for spatial averaging ͑the QW region is only 40 nm of the 500 nm resolution͒, this would translate to an error in temperature measurement of 15% for the line of pixels directly on the QWs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 The induced reflectance error can be calculated by ⌬R =4͑n r −1͒ / ͑n r +1͒ 3 ⌬n r ; a typical In-GaAsP QW high-bias carrier concentration of 2 ϫ 10 18 cm −3 will yield a refractive index variation ⌬n r of −0.02 and ⌬R / R = −0.008. 9,11 At I = 6 A, we measure ⌬R / R to be approximately 0.0058 in the QW region for the SCOWL and use this as a typical value. Accounting for spatial averaging ͑the QW region is only 40 nm of the 500 nm resolution͒, this would translate to an error in temperature measurement of 15% for the line of pixels directly on the QWs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, one needs to ensure that the material loss induced by carrier injection is much less than the transition rate η . For this purpose, we refer to [26][27] for some of the material considerations.…”
Section: A a C Dkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Constructive and destructive Fabry-Perot interferences were observed at the output of the waveguide, while a CW current was injected into the forwardbiased device, indicating a refractive index change. The effective refractive index change between two intensity maxima is Dn eff ¼ l/2L [5], where l is the transmitted wavelength and L the electrode length; the effective index takes into account the structure of the waveguide. Lightly tuning the current and the wavelength around a fringe, we found an increase of the index together with the injected current, which is, as expected, consistent with thermal effects [6].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%