2001
DOI: 10.1111/1467-985x.00195
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simple Methods for Ecological Inference in 2×2 Tables

Abstract: This paper considers inference about the individual level relationship between two dichotomous variables based on aggregated data. It is known that such analyses suffer from ecological bias', caused by the lack of homogeneity of this relationship across the groups over which the aggregation occurs. Two new methods for overcoming this bias, one based on local smoothing and the other a simple semiparametric approach, are developed and evaluated. The local smoothing approach performs best when it is used with a c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of binary MoB fusion distribution has been considered, for example, by Chambers and Steel (2001) in the context of ecological inference, but rarely in statistical matching. The discussion above shows that the MoB fusion distribution is more complicated to handle than CIA when merging data files containing nonbinary and/or multiple target variables.…”
Section: Middle Of Boundsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of binary MoB fusion distribution has been considered, for example, by Chambers and Steel (2001) in the context of ecological inference, but rarely in statistical matching. The discussion above shows that the MoB fusion distribution is more complicated to handle than CIA when merging data files containing nonbinary and/or multiple target variables.…”
Section: Middle Of Boundsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other regression-type approaches, with a non-parametric flavor, are described by Chambers and Steel (2001).…”
Section: The Fundamental Difficulty Of Ecological Inferencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of course, the methodological difficulties in estimating vote flows using aggregate data need to be addressed, and elsewhere we detail an extension of the Chambers-Steele (2001) method of aggregate data analysis that is especially suited for the problem at hand (Myagkov, Ordeshook, and Shakin, 2007;Myagkov, Shakin and Shulgin, 2007). An important caveat here is warranted by the fact that no method of aggregate data analysis can be perfect; aggregation error and the problems associated with ecological inference can never be wholly eliminated.…”
Section: Indicators Of Fraudmentioning
confidence: 99%