2014
DOI: 10.3846/13926292.2014.893263
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simple Models for Wall Effect in Fiber Suspension Flows

Abstract: Jeffery's equation describes the dynamics of a non-inertial ellipsoidal particle immersed in a Stokes liquid and is used in various models of fiber suspension flow. However, it is not valid in close neighbourhood of a rigid wall. Geometrically impossible orientation states with the fiber penetrating the wall can result from this model. This paper proposes a modification of Jeffery's equation in close proximity to a wall so that the geometrical constraints are obeyed by the solution. A class of models differing… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…73 Although the increase of the fiber aspect ratio results in the decrease of fiber number density, the longer fiber lengths will make an increase in the number of small bubbles attaching to the fibers, thus reducing the velocity of the fiber-bubble agglomerate. In addition, the "pole vaulting" phenomenon 74 generated by slender particles will keep fibers away from the wall, which results in a decrease of small bubbles near the wall and the mean bubble velocity decreases correspondingly. For descending bubble velocity distributions shown in Figure 6b, the variations of the mean bubble velocity are consistent with those of rising bubbles in regions 1 and 3: the variation of the mean bubble velocity is inversely proportional to that of the fiber number density, which indicates that the movement of small bubbles is easy to be hindered by the fibers, resulting in a decrease in bubble velocity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…73 Although the increase of the fiber aspect ratio results in the decrease of fiber number density, the longer fiber lengths will make an increase in the number of small bubbles attaching to the fibers, thus reducing the velocity of the fiber-bubble agglomerate. In addition, the "pole vaulting" phenomenon 74 generated by slender particles will keep fibers away from the wall, which results in a decrease of small bubbles near the wall and the mean bubble velocity decreases correspondingly. For descending bubble velocity distributions shown in Figure 6b, the variations of the mean bubble velocity are consistent with those of rising bubbles in regions 1 and 3: the variation of the mean bubble velocity is inversely proportional to that of the fiber number density, which indicates that the movement of small bubbles is easy to be hindered by the fibers, resulting in a decrease in bubble velocity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the increase of the fiber aspect ratio results in the decrease of fiber number density, the longer fiber lengths will make an increase in the number of small bubbles attaching to the fibers, thus reducing the velocity of the fiber-bubble agglomerate. In addition, the “pole vaulting” phenomenon generated by slender particles will keep fibers away from the wall, which results in a decrease of small bubbles near the wall and the mean bubble velocity decreases correspondingly.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well-known that when fibres interact with a solid wall, departures from the Jeffery's trajectories and orbits are prone to occur (Moses et al, 2001). Few theoretical studies proposed modifications of Jeffery's equations to account for confinements and/or wall effects (Schiek and Shaqfeh, 1997;Ozolins and Strautins, 2014;Perez et al, 2016Scheuer et al, 2018, Laurencin et al, 2019. In these models, the particle rotary velocity is split into two terms: the Jeffery rotary component (equation (20.4)) and a confined component which depends on the type of flow and the position of touching walls.…”
Section: Confinement Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While preparing this paper, it came to our attention that Eq. (12) had been derived independently in [26] using similar arguments but a different procedure.…”
Section: Microscopic Description Of Confined Kinematics Of An Individmentioning
confidence: 99%