2012
DOI: 10.1103/physreve.86.010501
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simple nonlinear equation for structural relaxation in glasses

Abstract: A wide range of glassy and disordered materials exhibit complex, non-exponential, structural relaxation (aging). We propose a simple nonlinear rate equation δ = a [1−exp (b δ)], where δ is the normalized deviation of a macroscopic variable from its equilibrium value, to describe glassy relaxation. Analysis of extensive experimental data shows that this equation quantitatively captures structural relaxation, where a and b are both temperature-, and more importantly, history-dependent parameters. This analysis e… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Examples range from time-dependent resistivity in disordered conductors [1][2][3][4][5], flux creep in superconductors [6,7], dynamics of spin glasses [8][9][10][11], structural relaxation of colloidal glasses [12,13], time-dependence of the static coefficient of friction [14][15][16], thermal expansion of polymers [17,18], compaction in agitated granular systems [19], and crumpling of thin sheets under load [20,21]. The ubiquity of slow relaxation phenomena suggests the existence of common underlying physical principles [22][23][24][25][26][27][28]. However, as slow relaxation is usually a smooth featureless process, it is hard to discern between the different descriptions using experiments.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples range from time-dependent resistivity in disordered conductors [1][2][3][4][5], flux creep in superconductors [6,7], dynamics of spin glasses [8][9][10][11], structural relaxation of colloidal glasses [12,13], time-dependence of the static coefficient of friction [14][15][16], thermal expansion of polymers [17,18], compaction in agitated granular systems [19], and crumpling of thin sheets under load [20,21]. The ubiquity of slow relaxation phenomena suggests the existence of common underlying physical principles [22][23][24][25][26][27][28]. However, as slow relaxation is usually a smooth featureless process, it is hard to discern between the different descriptions using experiments.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is necessary because a differential equation for only R(t) cannot account for the nonlinearity, whereas a differential equation involving only ∆X(t) cannot lead to nonexponentiality in the linear limit. There are other approaches to describing physical aging than the standard TN theory [36,56]. The common "singleparameter" assumption of all simple theories is that the quantity monitored correlates to the clock rate γ.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…which is identical to the evolution equation (1) discussed in [34]. Particularly, for constant a and b, the solution is given by [34] …”
Section: Comparison With Klompen Et Al [6]mentioning
confidence: 77%