2006
DOI: 10.1107/s0021889806005589
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simple procedure for conformation-family search in multidimensional torsion-angle space

Abstract: A method for studying conformation spaces in n dimensions has been developed. The method is used to calculate preferences of conformation families for the purpose of model building.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The methods described above to locate phosphates and bases in electron-density maps are effective even at medium resolution. rotamers) for backbone building (Keating & Pyle, 2010;Pavelcik & Vanco, 2006;Pavelcik & Schneider, 2008;Schneider et al, 2004). Since the sugar ring tends to be rather flexible and less well described in the density, we replace C4 0 with C1 0 in the above definitions of and , and use the angles 0 ¼ ðC1 0 iÀ1 ÀP i ÀC1 0 i ÀP iþ1 Þ and 0 ¼ ðP i ÀC1 0 i ÀP iþ1 ÀC1 0 iþ1 Þ to facilitate the construction of the correct backbone from the list of putative phosphates and bases (Gruene, 2008;Keating & Pyle, 2010).…”
Section: Backbone Tracingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The methods described above to locate phosphates and bases in electron-density maps are effective even at medium resolution. rotamers) for backbone building (Keating & Pyle, 2010;Pavelcik & Vanco, 2006;Pavelcik & Schneider, 2008;Schneider et al, 2004). Since the sugar ring tends to be rather flexible and less well described in the density, we replace C4 0 with C1 0 in the above definitions of and , and use the angles 0 ¼ ðC1 0 iÀ1 ÀP i ÀC1 0 i ÀP iþ1 Þ and 0 ¼ ðP i ÀC1 0 i ÀP iþ1 ÀC1 0 iþ1 Þ to facilitate the construction of the correct backbone from the list of putative phosphates and bases (Gruene, 2008;Keating & Pyle, 2010).…”
Section: Backbone Tracingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several groups have investigated the use of preferred conformations of RNA (i.e. rotamers) for backbone building (Keating & Pyle, 2010;Pavelcik & Vanco, 2006;Pavelcik & Schneider, 2008;Schneider et al, 2004). While at lower resolution this is probably the only possible approach, this work focuses on a slightly different approach with more localized and possibly less bias-prone properties.…”
Section: Backbone Tracingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However superimposition is not a practicable means of comparison for large sets of small structural motifs (hundreds and more). The most common practice is to display two-dimensional plots of the φ and ψ dihedral angles (Ramachandran plots [7]) at each residue [8-16]. Our program, Structure Motivator, also employs plots of dihedral angles of small three-dimensional structural elements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Protein conformations are mainly classified on the basis of hydrogen-bonding patterns and the two-dimensional Ramachandran plot (Ramachandran & Sasisekharan, 1963). Limited information is available for higher dimensional spaces (Pavelcik & Vanco, 2006;Sims et al, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A detailed analysis of twodimensional space has recently been published (Hovmö ller et al, 2002). Results for tripeptides in four-dimensional torsionangle space can be found in Pavelcik & Vanco (2006). Sims et al (2005) have analyzed higher dimensional (', ) n maps.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%