A dlrect comparlson of the capabllitles of photoacoustlc (PA) and dkfuse reflectance (DR) spectroscoples In the ultraviolet, visible, and nearinfrared spectral regions was made by collecting both types of spectra under nearly Identical conditions. This comparison focused on the followlng aspects: (1) slgnal-to-nolse ratio and sensltlvlty; (2) spectral deflnltlon and those factors, such as saturation and partlcle 8/28, whlch affect spectral deflnltlon; and (3) sample preparation conslderatlons for both qualltatlve and quantltatlve analysls. I n terms of signal-to-noise ratlo and spectral deflnltlon the two techniques are vMuaHy lndlstlngulshable for weakly absorbing, finely dlvlded powders. DRS Is slightly more SenSnlve but has a lower saturatlon llmA than does PAS and Is more severely affected by changes In particle slze. For particles larger than 100 pm, DR spectra are distorted and spectral deflnltlon Is degraded. I n terms of sample Preparation, especially when only qualitative results are desired, PAS Is clearly superlor. For quantitative resuits both techniques requlre careful control of particle 8/28, packing density, and total absorption.