2022
DOI: 10.1080/10586458.2022.2062073
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simple Type Theory is not too Simple: Grothendieck’s Schemes Without Dependent Types

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is also worth noting that the difficulty of encoding theorems in a given system may vary depending on its axiomatic foundations. In 2021, Anthony Bordg, Lawrence Paulson, and Wenda Li formalized Grothendieck's schemes in Isabelle, despite the difficulty of doing so with Isabelle's higher-order logic, which is weaker than Lean's dependent type theory [15].…”
Section: Practical Standard Of Computer-assisted Proofs By Exhaustionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also worth noting that the difficulty of encoding theorems in a given system may vary depending on its axiomatic foundations. In 2021, Anthony Bordg, Lawrence Paulson, and Wenda Li formalized Grothendieck's schemes in Isabelle, despite the difficulty of doing so with Isabelle's higher-order logic, which is weaker than Lean's dependent type theory [15].…”
Section: Practical Standard Of Computer-assisted Proofs By Exhaustionmentioning
confidence: 99%