2020
DOI: 10.1049/iet-epa.2019.0822
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simplified algorithm for assessment equivalent circuit parameters of induction motors

Abstract: Induction or asynchronous AC motors are widely used in the electromechanical industries. However, the selection of an appropriate motor for specific drive applications represents a non-trivial task. The most effective and universally accepted method is to use equivalent T-circuit for this purpose. Parameter determination of equivalent circuit should be done relatively fast and accurately. This article describes a novel and simplified method for the estimation of equivalent circuit parameters, which is exclusiv… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In an efficiently designed and manufactured IMs, the stator leakage inductance (L ls) and rotor leakage inductance referred to the stator side (L lr) are always small in terms of L m; total leakage inductance (L σ = L lr + L ls) and thus L ls and L lr can be easily determined by the IEEE Standard 112‐1996 Test Procedure for Polyphase Induction Motors and Generators [28] or the other methods as in [29–31]. The load‐dependent variations about 20% [32] in L σ, L ls or L lr are usually ignored in the estimation and control performances since they are less important on the performances than R r and L m [31].…”
Section: Real‐time Experimental Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In an efficiently designed and manufactured IMs, the stator leakage inductance (L ls) and rotor leakage inductance referred to the stator side (L lr) are always small in terms of L m; total leakage inductance (L σ = L lr + L ls) and thus L ls and L lr can be easily determined by the IEEE Standard 112‐1996 Test Procedure for Polyphase Induction Motors and Generators [28] or the other methods as in [29–31]. The load‐dependent variations about 20% [32] in L σ, L ls or L lr are usually ignored in the estimation and control performances since they are less important on the performances than R r and L m [31].…”
Section: Real‐time Experimental Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pedra J. and Sainz L. discussed in detail the shortcomings of four methods mentioned in [3] and proposed a set of methods combining non-load test, locked-rotor test and overload test [4], but ignored the effect of iron loss [5]. The nameplate data given by the manufacturer or empirical values provided by the National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA) are used to estimate ECPs [6][7][8][9][10], but these values are difficult to guarantee parameter accuracies of the IM used. Based on the inverse-Γ equivalent circuit at standstill [11], Peretti L. and Zigliotto M. proposed to obtain parameter values with different test signals in the sequence, that is, the stator resistance is estimated by imposing DC current, the transient inductance is estimated by injecting a high-frequency sinusoidal test signal and the rotor resistance is obtained by the exciting system with a sinusoidal low-frequency and low-amplitude voltage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The calculation procedure is based on the use of the equivalent circuit [4][5][6]. The resistors evaluate the different types of losses appear: Joule losses on the stator and the rotor, and the iron losses [7,8]: the stator resistance depending on the diameter of the conductor being used, the rotor resistance depends on the variation of the section of the rotor cage, as well as the iron losses resistance and how it is affected by the type of ferromagnetic steel selected and its specific iron losses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%