2000
DOI: 10.1002/1096-9845(200008)29:8<1153::aid-eqe961>3.0.co;2-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simplified seismic fragility analysis of structures with two types of friction devices

Abstract: SUMMARYThis paper presents a method and results of seismic fragility estimation of frame structures with friction devices and with friction devices and restrictors. The seismic intensity parameter, de"ned as the mean value of the pseudovelocity spectrum in a speci"ed periods band, is proved to allow the use of linear regression analysis of the response parameters of the considered non-linear structures on seismic intensity. A simpli"ed method of fragility estimation is proposed, based on the concept of &mean s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the local collapse states, non-cumulative indicators in terms of displacement, cumulative indicators in terms of energy, and / or mixed indicators (a combination of both groups of indicators) can be used. For instance, Shinozoka's ductility ratio [16], Dimova's stories drift [17], and Ang and Park's collapse indicators by Karim and Yamazaki [18] can be mentioned. Among these introduced indicators, the stories drift or the maximum inter-story displacement ratio are related to the non-cumulative local indicators which have been used by numerous scholars [19].…”
Section: Deterioration States and Criterions Of The Structural Collapsementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the local collapse states, non-cumulative indicators in terms of displacement, cumulative indicators in terms of energy, and / or mixed indicators (a combination of both groups of indicators) can be used. For instance, Shinozoka's ductility ratio [16], Dimova's stories drift [17], and Ang and Park's collapse indicators by Karim and Yamazaki [18] can be mentioned. Among these introduced indicators, the stories drift or the maximum inter-story displacement ratio are related to the non-cumulative local indicators which have been used by numerous scholars [19].…”
Section: Deterioration States and Criterions Of The Structural Collapsementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 7 shows the steel moment frame without the proposed systems. It consists of (degrees) 10 20 Figure 8(a) portrays the damping device detail that comprises VEDs, tension rods, and a pin-supported seesaw member. Figure 8(b) shows the analysis model in which some rigid truss members form both the seesaw member and the pin-support.…”
Section: Design Of the Steel Moment Framementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rossetto and Elnashai (2003) question the reliability of this method as a result of varying expert opinion. Analytical curves (Dimova and Hirata, 2000) are derived from damage distributions of simulated damage data by either nonlinear quasi-static or inelastic time history dynamic methods or both. This involves a lot of computational effort and modelling deficiencies in an attempt to reduce variability of damage estimates.…”
Section: Fragility-based Assessment Of Non-ductile Rc Frame Buildingsmentioning
confidence: 99%