Simplifying Concurrent Programming of Networked Embedded Systems

Khezri, M.; Sarram, Mehdi Agha; Adibniya, F.

doi:10.1109/ispa.2008.138

Cited by 2 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 9 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Schimpf 2012 Strube 2010 Karpinski 2007, Fritzsche 2010, Inam 2011, Khezri 2008, Boers 2010, Bergel 2011, Glistvain 2010Susilo 2009, Jahier 2016, Niebert 2014, Evers 2007 Heap Unknown Fig. 8.…”

Section: Static/globalmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…An implementation that supports all three strategies, and allows control over which is used, is therefore desirable. Cohen et al 2007Evers et al 2007Karpinski et al 2007Kumar et al 2007Khezri et al 2008Susilo et al 2009Boers et al 2010Fritzsche et al 2010Glistvain et al 2010St-Amour et al 2010Strube et al 2010Bergel et al 2011Inam et al 2011Schimpf 2012Niebert et al 2014Motika et al 2015Park et al 2015Andersen et al 2016Jahier 2016Andersen et al 2017Kalebe et al 2017 Ideal outcome Key: -e issue is considered and resolved. -e issue is addressed but not resolved.…”

Section: Static/globalmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Approximately 55% of the surviving studies immediately failed the inclusion criteria, leaving 125 to be studied in full. A er applying the inclusion criteria on the basis of the entire text, about 72% failed, and 35 studies were retained (Alvira and Barton 2013;Andalam et al 2014;Andersen et al 2016Andersen et al , 2017Bergel et al 2011;Boers et al 2010;Clark 2009;Cohen et al 2007;Durmaz et al 2017;Elsts et al 2017;Evers et al 2007;Fritzsche and Siemers 2010;Glistvain and Aboelaze 2010;Inam et al 2011;Jääskeläinen et al 2008;Jahier 2016;Kalebe et al 2017;Karpinski and Cahill 2007;Khezri et al 2008;Kugler et al 2013;Kumar et al 2007;Liu et al 2011;Lohmann et al 2012;Motika and von Hanxleden 2015;Niebert and Caralp 2014;Noman et al 2017;Oldewurtel et al 2009;Park et al 2015;Riedel et al 2010;Schimpf 2012;St-Amour and Feeley 2010;Strube et al 2010;Susilo et al 2009;von Hanxleden 2009;Yu et al 2008). Of these, 21 studies included a discussion of the implementation of coroutines.…”

Section: Data Setmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Two studies called out to another language to implement the coroutines: one (Park et al 2015), wri en in the Lua language (De Moura et al 2004), directly manipulated the hosting environment through the C API; another (Khezri et al 2008) used non-portable assembly language. e results are summarised in Figure 2b.…”

Section: Coroutine Implementationmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Two papers employed a transpiler that translates from one language to another -one from Lustre to OCaml (Jahier 2016) and one from a synchronous extension of C to standard C(Karpinski and Cahill 2007). One paper (Fritzsche and Siemers 2010) used a precompiler, and one paper(Jääskeläinen et al 2008) provided a new compiler optimisation phase.Two studies called out to another language to implement the coroutines: one(Park et al 2015), wri en in the Lua language (DeMoura et al 2004), directly manipulated the hosting environment through the C API; another(Khezri et al 2008) used non-portable assembly language. e results are summarised inFigure 2b…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

A Survey of Asynchronous Programming Using Coroutines in the Internet of Things and Embedded Systems

Belson

Holdsworth

Wang

et al. 2019

ACM Trans. Embed. Comput. Syst.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Many Internet of ings and embedded projects are event-driven, and therefore require asynchronous and concurrent programming.Current proposals for C++20 suggest that coroutines will have native language support. It is timely to survey the current use of coroutines in embedded systems development.is paper investigates existing research which uses or describes coroutines on resource-constrained platforms. e existing research is analysed with regard to: so ware platform, hardware platform and capacity;use cases and intended bene ts; and the application programming interface design used for coroutines. A systematic mapping study was performed, to select studies published between 2007 and 2018 which contained original research into the application of coroutines on resource-constrained platforms. An initial set of 566 candidate papers, collated from on-line databases, were reduced to only 35 a er lters were applied, revealing the following taxonomy. e C & C++ programming languages were used by 22 studies out of 35.As regards hardware, 16 studies used 8-or 16-bit processors while 13 used 32-bit processors. e four most common use cases were concurrency (17 papers), network communication (15), sensor readings (9) and data ow (7). e leading intended bene ts were code style and simplicity (12 papers), scheduling (9) and e ciency (8). A wide variety of techniques have been used to implement coroutines, including native macros, additional tool chain steps, new language features and non-portable assembly language. We conclude that there is widespread demand for coroutines on resource-constrained devices. Our ndings suggest that there is signi cant demand for a formalised, stable, well-supported implementation of coroutines in C++, designed with consideration of the special needs of resource-constrained devices, and further that such an implementation would bring bene ts speci c to such devices.

show abstract