2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2020.109382
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SIMREG, a tree-level distance-independent model to simulate forest dynamics and management from national forest inventory (NFI) data

Abstract: SIMREG is a non-deterministic tree-level distance independent forest model that can simulate forest growth, yield and management on a regional scale while representing the wide diversity of composition, structure and management found in forest stands. It is composed of several sub-models to represent the main forest dynamics (growth, recruitment, removal, clearcut and reforestation) and to account for species composition, stand density, tree size and social status, forest ownership type and some sites characte… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared to current climate, the use of this scenario likely resulted in an increased C sink of the DOM and soil pools due to more optimal conditions (i.e., warmer temperatures with still sufficient precipitation in the majority of Swiss forests) lead to increased tree growth but also to a faster decomposition of the DOM. Similar forest growth models applied in Europe are not climate sensitive (Barreiro et al, 2016;Vauhkonen et al, 2019) with the assumption that on relatively short time scales of 50 years management effects are more important than climate ones (Perin et al, 2021). For future improvements of MASSIMO, however, the effects of climate change on forest development should be accounted for, as they are becoming increasingly apparent (e.g., Schelhaas et al, 2015;Reyer et al, 2017;Seidl et al, 2017;Rohner et al, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to current climate, the use of this scenario likely resulted in an increased C sink of the DOM and soil pools due to more optimal conditions (i.e., warmer temperatures with still sufficient precipitation in the majority of Swiss forests) lead to increased tree growth but also to a faster decomposition of the DOM. Similar forest growth models applied in Europe are not climate sensitive (Barreiro et al, 2016;Vauhkonen et al, 2019) with the assumption that on relatively short time scales of 50 years management effects are more important than climate ones (Perin et al, 2021). For future improvements of MASSIMO, however, the effects of climate change on forest development should be accounted for, as they are becoming increasingly apparent (e.g., Schelhaas et al, 2015;Reyer et al, 2017;Seidl et al, 2017;Rohner et al, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, we determined the aboveground carbon stock in living tree biomass for each plot following the method described in the national forestry accounting plan of Belgium (Perin et al, 2019):…”
Section: Carbon Stocksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We calculated the stump volume-V stump -as a cylinder with height 10 cm and radius derived from the tree's diameter and height using taper functions of Dagnelie et al (2013). We used the species-specific wood density values-WDfrom the national forestry accounting plan of Belgium (Perin et al, 2019; Supplementary Table S5) and the default carbon fraction-CFof 0.5 as in Penman et al (2003). As we focus on aboveground carbon stocks only, we did not use a root-to-shoot ratio (i.e., factor R in Eq.…”
Section: Carbon Stocksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, plot centers for each dataset were relocated if necessary by photo-interpretation of tree crown position in the CHM. Owing to the time gap between ALS data acquisition and field inventories (≤2 growing seasons), c150 data were corrected using Equation (1) in [60] according to species.…”
Section: Field Data Pre-processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Species-specific SSDs were derived from three successive and dependent components: species class, circumference class, and number of stems. The relationship between ALS and field variables strongly varies depending on the species, and for a given species within a given area, circumference is one of the most important explanatory variables for estimating the number of stems [33,60]. Errors in these estimations thus accumulate and exacerbate one other.…”
Section: Neural Network Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%