2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2005.07.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SIMS analyses of oxygen isotopes: Matrix effects in Fe–Mg–Ca garnets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
82
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
82
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[64][65][66][67][68][69][70][71] Lyon et al 72 observed an effect of the crystallographic orientation of a sample relative to the secondary ion beam focused on the sample on isotope fractionation. This effect was shown to be significant for magnetite and hematite but not for other samples such as quartz or olivine.…”
Section: Instrumental Isotopic Fractionation In Simsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…[64][65][66][67][68][69][70][71] Lyon et al 72 observed an effect of the crystallographic orientation of a sample relative to the secondary ion beam focused on the sample on isotope fractionation. This effect was shown to be significant for magnetite and hematite but not for other samples such as quartz or olivine.…”
Section: Instrumental Isotopic Fractionation In Simsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Each majorite sample was analysed twice, and in each case the two spots were identical within uncertainty. A major obstacle to accurate SIMS analysis is the dependence of the instrumental mass fractionation on the chemical composition and structure of the target material, the so called "matrix effect" (Russell et al, 1980;Eiler et al, 1997;Vielzeuf et al, 2005;Page et al, 2010). We employ the technique described by Page et al (2010) to correct for the bias between the primary reference material and the majorite samples based on Ca-content.…”
Section: We Made High-precision Sims δmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The variable effect of mineral composition on instrumental mass fractionation (IMF) presents a major difficulty in accurate ion microprobe analysis of minerals with complex solid solutions such as garnet (e.g. Hervig et al , 1992; Eiler et al , 1997; Vielzeuf et al , 2005a). Vielzeuf et al (2005a) noted that in a large‐radius, multi‐collecting ion microprobe, the grossular content of garnet appears to exert the greatest effect on the IMF in garnet analyses, and speculated that the molar volume of garnet might be correlated with IMF.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hervig et al , 1992; Eiler et al , 1997; Vielzeuf et al , 2005a). Vielzeuf et al (2005a) noted that in a large‐radius, multi‐collecting ion microprobe, the grossular content of garnet appears to exert the greatest effect on the IMF in garnet analyses, and speculated that the molar volume of garnet might be correlated with IMF. Vielzeuf et al (2005a) developed a correction scheme that is based on a least‐square calculation of IMFs from a set of standards that bracket the cation composition (specifically Ca, Fe 2+ and Mg) of the unknown garnet.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%