2019
DOI: 10.1134/s1063782619040195
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulated Contrast of Two Dislocations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For this reason, it is bound to "refrain from signing a memorandum of understanding" when "it doubts" its consistency with EU law. 206 To be sure, the judgment represents a welcome novelty, at least from the perspective of aggrieved individuals, because it is the first case where the Court has finally admitted the possibility that bailout measures are amenable to some form of judicial review in the EU legal order. However, the action for damages is a narrow avenue for the judicial protection of fundamental rights, and it is doubtful whether it can properly safeguard national social spaces' objectives and functions in the context of structural adjustment programmes.…”
Section: Attempts At Socialising Structural Adjustment Programmes: mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this reason, it is bound to "refrain from signing a memorandum of understanding" when "it doubts" its consistency with EU law. 206 To be sure, the judgment represents a welcome novelty, at least from the perspective of aggrieved individuals, because it is the first case where the Court has finally admitted the possibility that bailout measures are amenable to some form of judicial review in the EU legal order. However, the action for damages is a narrow avenue for the judicial protection of fundamental rights, and it is doubtful whether it can properly safeguard national social spaces' objectives and functions in the context of structural adjustment programmes.…”
Section: Attempts At Socialising Structural Adjustment Programmes: mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…367 Moreover, Ledra Advertising constitutes a landmark decision in the field of European financial assistance in which it clearly spells out the obligation of EU institutions to respect human rights when formulating financial assistance conditionality. Filling the gap left on this issue in Pringle, the Court of Justice followed the Opinion of Advocate General Kokott, explicitly stating that the Charter binds EU institutions in all circumstances, even when they act outside the EU legal framework 368. Another significant case which has recently been in the limelight is the AGET-Iraklis case369 C-201/15.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%