2016
DOI: 10.1111/plb.12447
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulated herbivory does not constrain phenotypic plasticity to shade through ontogeny in a relict tree

Abstract: Ecological limits to phenotypic plasticity (PP), induced by simultaneous biotic and abiotic factors, can prevent organisms from exhibiting optimal plasticity, and in turn lead to decreased fitness. Herbivory is an important biotic stressor and may limit plant functional responses to challenging environmental conditions such as shading. In this study we investigated whether plant functional responses and PP to shade are constrained by herbivory, and whether such constraints are due to direct effects based on re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Simulated herbivory has been intensely utilized to determine likely herbivory effects on plant growth, biomass partitioning, reproduction and morphology (Camargo et al 2015;Pardo et al 2016;Yamawo et al 2018). Besides, simulated herbivory contributes to obtaining physiological responses of plants after damage and the resultant effects of biotic and abiotic interactions (Tscharntke et al 2001;Scott et al 2019).The increase of F0 in the leaves of plants grown in ambient [CO 2 ] and subjected to simulated herbivory at the basal or apical portion of the stem is possibly related to the existence of damage at the PSII reaction center or to the reduction of energy transfer capacity of excitation from the light collecting system to the reaction center (Baker & Rosenqvist 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simulated herbivory has been intensely utilized to determine likely herbivory effects on plant growth, biomass partitioning, reproduction and morphology (Camargo et al 2015;Pardo et al 2016;Yamawo et al 2018). Besides, simulated herbivory contributes to obtaining physiological responses of plants after damage and the resultant effects of biotic and abiotic interactions (Tscharntke et al 2001;Scott et al 2019).The increase of F0 in the leaves of plants grown in ambient [CO 2 ] and subjected to simulated herbivory at the basal or apical portion of the stem is possibly related to the existence of damage at the PSII reaction center or to the reduction of energy transfer capacity of excitation from the light collecting system to the reaction center (Baker & Rosenqvist 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A ausência de alteração em defesas antiherbivoria na condição de competição edáfica juntamente com a herbivoria possivelmente ocorreu pelas variáveis analisadas aqui neste trabalho (clorofila e esclerofilia) não serem tipos de defesas antiherbivoria presente nessa espécie (Hanley et al 2007;Ambrósio et al 2008). Por fim, a ausência do aumento dos impactos negativos da associação da herbivoria com sombreamento e da herbivoria com competição edáfica em T. diversifolia, pode indicar que essa espécie possui tolerância a associação de mais de um fator negativo por esses não terem sido tão intensos ao ponto impactá-la severamente (Wise & Abrahamson 2007;Pardo et al 2016).…”
Section: Respostas Vegetativasunclassified