“…The hybrid-solvent CpHMD resulted in a positive pK a shift of 1.5 (relative to the model value), much closer to the experimental shift of 0.1 compared to the negative shift of −3.0 from the GB-based CpHMD. 17 The analysis suggested that the improvement is due to the more accurate representation of the conformational dynamics of the micelle, which is too rigid and compact in the GB solvent, while the remaining error, i.e., overestimation of the pK a shift, is due to the neglect of the effect of explicit ions, which is significant for the DTA micelle but cannot be captured by the Debye-Hückel screening term in the hybrid-solvent CpHMD. 17 Most recently, an all-atom CpHMD method was developed, which uses explicit solvent to drive the dynamics in both conformational and protonation states, thus enabling the effects of ions to be explicitly taken into account.…”