2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2014.09.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulating radiation damage cascades in graphite

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
30
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fig. 6 shows a time series of images for the 1 keV cascade, demonstrating the fractal-like character of the trajectories as discussed in detail in [8]. The PKA is initiated in the bottom-right region of Fig.…”
Section: N-body Systemmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Fig. 6 shows a time series of images for the 1 keV cascade, demonstrating the fractal-like character of the trajectories as discussed in detail in [8]. The PKA is initiated in the bottom-right region of Fig.…”
Section: N-body Systemmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Long-range aspherical terms in the latter allow EDIP to accurately describe the pathway between graphite and diamond, enabling an accurate description of liquid, amorphous and crystalline forms of carbon, including nanodiamonds [9], nanotubes [10], glassy carbon [11] and carbon onions [12,13]. To describe close-approach interactions present in a radiation damage cascade the EDIP potential smoothly switches across to the Ziegler-Biersack-Littmark (ZBL) pair potential [14] as first employed in [15,16] and described in detail in [8]. All calculations were performed in an NVE ensemble and the Verlet integrator was used.…”
Section: N-body Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…simulations of the impact of energetic particles on graphite [13][14][15][16][17] tend to confirm the formation of pinned interstitial atoms. However, these theoretical and simulation studies are limited to primary damage, in which only a small fraction of the atoms are displaced (10 −2 in Ref.…”
Section: A C C E P T E D Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…using TEM and DFT [55]) and graphite (25 eV using MD simulations [16,50]). A last point to mention here is that, for simplicity and because of lack of available data, we have considered here that the dose is a linear function of irradiation time (or electron fluence).…”
Section: A C C E P T E D Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%