2013
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.88.134409
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulating rare switching events of magnetic nanostructures with forward flux sampling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, Q is the configuration space of the underlying system, and A and B are two of its local free energy minima. In recent years, FFS has been used for studying a wide range of rare-event-driven phenomena such as evaporation [18][19][20], coalescence [21], wetting [22], magnetic switching [23], protein folding [24], DNA hybridization [25,26], phase separation in active systems [27], protein aggregation [28] and crystal nucleation [29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, Q is the configuration space of the underlying system, and A and B are two of its local free energy minima. In recent years, FFS has been used for studying a wide range of rare-event-driven phenomena such as evaporation [18][19][20], coalescence [21], wetting [22], magnetic switching [23], protein folding [24], DNA hybridization [25,26], phase separation in active systems [27], protein aggregation [28] and crystal nucleation [29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The energy barrier calculations is achieved through a numerical technique called Nudged Elastic Band Method [14][15][16] (NEBM), which calculates minimum energy transitions between equilibrium states in magnetic systems. We use an optimised version of the algorithm recently proposed by Bessarab et al 16 since they claim that early versions of the method [17][18][19][20] lead to uncontrolled behaviour of the algorithm. In particular, we are interested on the minimum energy path between two states, since it gives us the smallest energy required, i.e.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular we present a series of M H hysteresis loops calculated at constant sweep rate over a range of coupling constants to examine the effect of the exchange parameter and sweep rate on the M H hysteresis loops. This work compliments and extends previous studies of dual-grain-reversal energy landscapes 23 and formulations of the dual-grain attempt frequency, 19,24 and serves as an precursor to our formulation and application of the combined MEP-KMC algorithm to study interacting N×N×2 ECC thin films which includes both magnetostatic and intralayer exchange interactions. 25 In the following section, we discuss the energy landscapes for a dual layer grain, which we model as a system consisting of two coupled Stoner-Wohlfarth particles (SWPs) in a magnetic field.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 55%