2018
DOI: 10.1002/hyp.13182
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulating saturation‐excess surface run‐off in a semi‐distributed hydrological model

Abstract: The level of complexity, and the number of parameters, to include in a hydrological model is a relatively contentious issue in hydrological modelling. However, it can be argued that explicitly representing important run‐off generation processes can improve the practical value of a model's outputs. This paper explores the benefits of including a new function into an existing semi‐distributed hydrological model (the Pitman model) that is widely used in the sub‐Saharan Africa region. The new function was designed… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The WEAP model results are very similar as the parameterisation was guided by the parameter sets used for the Pitman model. In general terms, the partitioning shown is consistent with what we expect in the different parts of the Zambezi, as well as with previously reported results for similar areas ( Winsemius et al, 2006 ; Hughes and Mazibuko, 2018 ). KAF4 on the Lunga River is quite typical of many of the sub-basins of the Kafue and Luangwa river systems, where there is an almost equal split between the three runoff components and the surface runoff is dominated by saturation-excess runoff due to the presence of Dambos.…”
Section: Model Validity With Respect To Simulated Hydrological Processupporting
confidence: 92%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The WEAP model results are very similar as the parameterisation was guided by the parameter sets used for the Pitman model. In general terms, the partitioning shown is consistent with what we expect in the different parts of the Zambezi, as well as with previously reported results for similar areas ( Winsemius et al, 2006 ; Hughes and Mazibuko, 2018 ). KAF4 on the Lunga River is quite typical of many of the sub-basins of the Kafue and Luangwa river systems, where there is an almost equal split between the three runoff components and the surface runoff is dominated by saturation-excess runoff due to the presence of Dambos.…”
Section: Model Validity With Respect To Simulated Hydrological Processupporting
confidence: 92%
“…A key geomorphological feature of the western parts of the Luangwa River basin is the presence of Dambos, which are relatively small, but frequent, valley bottom wetlands that have the potential to generate saturated surface runoff during the early part of the wet season ( Hughes and Mazibuko, 2018 ). The other key feature is the Luangwa River floodplain, although recent work suggests that the downstream impacts (attenuation and delay) are quite minimal at the monthly time scale ( Makungu, 2019 ) and no wetland effects were included in the WEAP model.…”
Section: Calibration Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Most of the original structure (Pitman, 1973), as well as more recent additions (Hughes, 2004;Hughes and Mazibuko, 2018) to the model have been designed to represent processes explicitly, albeit at the sub-basin scale, using approaches that are similar to the probability distributed principle of Moore (1985). Figure 1 provides an illustration of the model structure, and includes the equations, parameter symbols and simulated state variables referred to in the following sub-sections (more details about some of the other model components can be found in Pitman (1973), Hughes (2004) and Hughes and Mazibuko (2018)).…”
Section: The Pitman Model and Process Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 99%