Abstract• Key message Phytosanitary risks are an increasing threat for forest, particularly due to climate change. Risk handling measures are effective economic strategies to manage such risks, so that Economics may provide relevant methodology to address this new challenge.• Context Hylobius abietis and Heterobasidion annosum are two phytosanitary risks generating increasing damage in the Landes de Gascogne Forest.• Aims We provide an economic comparison of different existing risk handling measures against Hylobius abietis and Heterobasidion annosum.• Methods We use the Land Expectation Value, i.e., Faustmann criteria, to compare the different scenarios.• Results We find that for Hylobius abietis, chemical treatment and fallow seem to be economically preferable to the absence of risk handling measure. For Heterobasidion
Handling Editor: Marc HanewinkelContribution of the co-authors The two co-authors supervised the internship of Alexandre Gourdy that provided the preliminary version of the article. The manuscript was written by the two coauthors. Marielle Brunette focused more on the section dedicated to Hylobius abietis while Sylvain Caurla provided the analysis for Heterobasidion annosum.
Marielle BrunetteMarielle.Brunette@nancy.inra.fr Sylvain Caurla Sylvain.Caurla@nancy.inra.fr 1 LEF, AgroParisTech, INRA, 54000 Nancy, France annosum, we show that local stump removal is always preferable to total stump removal and chemical treatment. Local stump removal should be preferred to fallow when contamination occurs during the second thinning. Finally, our results indicate that fallow is always preferable to chemical treatment.• Conclusion Beyond the specificities of the case study, the paper proposes a methodology to analyze such a problematic.