SiC‐based fibers are subjected to slow crack growth, a crack growth mechanism activated by stresses and the chemical environment, as identified by static fatigue testing. Such tests can be performed on filaments or bundles. Although both types of specimens show a similar lifetime variation, testing of bundles is often preferred. This work compares the scatter of lifetimes predicted for filaments and for tows using a dedicated Monte Carlo simulation tool relying on the following hypotheses: The stress applied to a single filament can be defined, whereas the size of its most critical flaw cannot; on a bundle, neither the applied stress nor the strength of the critical filament (which triggers the cascade failure and the tow failure) can be defined. Depending on the parallelism of fibers inside the bundle and their strength dispersion, the lifetime scatter can be narrower for filaments compared to tows or vice versa.