2019
DOI: 10.3390/ma12081343
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulation and Experimental Study on Residual Stress Distribution in Titanium Alloy Treated by Laser Shock Peening with Flat-Top and Gaussian Laser Beams

Abstract: The residual stress introduced by laser shock peening (LSP) is one of the most important factors in improving metallic fatigue life. The shock wave pressure has considerable influence on residual stress distribution, which is affected by the distribution of laser energy. In this work, a titanium alloy is treated by LSP with flat-top and Gaussian laser beams, and the effects of spatial energy distribution on residual stress are investigated. Firstly, a 3D finite element model (FEM) is developed to predict resid… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Uprising technologies that are currently heavily investigated such as laser shock peening could be considered. A comparison of the three-dimensional FEA carried out by Li et al, also using the JC model to the two-dimensional model, will be considered [60]. Recent work from Dong et al describes the development of a FEA for machining operations [61].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Uprising technologies that are currently heavily investigated such as laser shock peening could be considered. A comparison of the three-dimensional FEA carried out by Li et al, also using the JC model to the two-dimensional model, will be considered [60]. Recent work from Dong et al describes the development of a FEA for machining operations [61].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The peak pressure can be calculated from Equation (7). Here, P peak (GPa) is the peak plasma pressure; α is the correction factor of the internal energy and the thermal energy (usually α ≈ 0.25 ); I (GW • cm −2 ) is the laser pulse power density, where P pulse is the laser pulse power and A peen is the laser spot area at the working point; Z (g • cm −2 s −1 ) is the combined acoustic impedance of the confinement layer Z water (≈0.15 × 10 6 ) of water and the target material Z target (≈4.5 × 10 6 ) of stainless steel [8,12,29,30].…”
Section: Pressure Load Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, the 2D pressure load distribution from the beam center to the radial direction is also considered. Depending on the laser beam pulse profile, Gaussian or flat-top models have been suggested [12]. Sun et al [31] proposed a mixed shape of Gaussian and flat-top according to measurements from the beam profiler.…”
Section: Pressure Load Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Johnson-Cook (J-C) material model [ 13 , 14 ] was adopted, which is widely used under high strain rate conditions such as high-speed impact and explosion impact. Taking into account the absorption protection layer and water confinement layer on the surface of samples, the thermal effect is ignored [ 15 , 16 ]. The model is rewritten as Equation (1): where A is the yield strength of the material, B is the work hardening modulus, n is the hardening coefficient, C reflects the strain rate hardening effect of the material, is the plastic strain, and is the dimensionless plastic strain rate.…”
Section: Laser Shock Peening Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%