Simulation-based Emergency Medicine Resident Self-Assessment

Sadosty, Annie T.; Bellolio, M. Fernanda; Laack, Torrey A.; Luke, Anuradha; Weaver, Amy L.; Goyal, Deepi G.

doi:10.1016/j.jemermed.2011.05.041

Cited by 28 publications

(23 citation statements)

References 13 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In the absence of these tools, educators are left with impression and possibly faulty measurements of resident skills. The graduate medical education literature is clear that resident self-assessment is often flawed and depends highly on the learner's skill level 9 10. By creating and scrutinising assessment tools, the consistency and quality of medical encounters and procedures can be improved.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Validation of a performance checklist for ultrasound-guided internal jugular central lines for use in procedural instruction and assessment

Hartman

Wittler

Askew

et al. 2016

Postgraduate Medical Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background:We have created and validated a checklist for performance of ultrasound guided internal jugular central venous catheter (US IJ CVC) placement using the modified Delphi method. We now seek to validate it for use in an educational environment in order to evaluate competency in procedure performance.Objectives: To evaluate a checklist tool for assessment of resident skill in US IJ CVC placement. We hypothesize that

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Validation of a performance checklist for ultrasound-guided internal jugular central lines for use in procedural instruction and assessment

Hartman

Wittler

Askew

et al. 2016

Postgraduate Medical Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In a systematic review by Davis et al ,21 of the 20 comparisons between self and external assessment, 13 demonstrated little, no, or an inverse relationship between self-assessment measures and other indicators; level of training of the individuals studied did not influence their rating ability. Sadosty et al 22 observed that the EM residents’ self-assessment agreed well with the faculty assessment. Residents who scored above the 50th centile in a simulated patient encounter were able to self-assess more accurately than those who scored below.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 85%

Teamwork evaluation during emergency medicine residents’ high-fidelity simulation

Innocenti¹,

Angeli²,

Alesi³

et al. 2016

BMJ STEL

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundTeamwork training has been included in several emergency medicine (EM) curricula; the aim of this study was to compare different scales’ performance in teamwork evaluation during simulation for EM residents.MethodsIn the period October 2013–June 2014, we performed bimonthly high-fidelity simulation sessions, with novice (I–III year, group 1 (G1)) and senior (IV–V year, group 2 (G2)) EM residents; scenarios were designed to simulate management of critical patients. Videos were assessed by three independent raters with the following scales: Emergency Team Dynamics (ETD), Clinical Teamwork Scale (CTS) and Team Emergency Assessment Measure (TEAM). In the period March–June, after each scenario, participants completed the CTS and ETD.ResultsThe analysis based on 18 sessions showed good internal consistency and good to fair inter-rater reliability for the three scales (TEAM, CTS, ETD: Cronbach's α 0.954, 0.954, 0.921; Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICC), 0.921, 0.917, 0.608). Single CTS items achieved highly significant ICC results, with 12 of the total 13 comparisons achieving ICC results ≥0.70; a similar result was confirmed for 4 of the total 11 TEAM items and 1 of the 8 total ETD items. Spearman's r was 0.585 between ETD and CTS, 0.694 between ETD and TEAM, and 0.634 between TEAM and CTS (scales converted to percentages, all p<0.0001). Participants gave themselves a better evaluation compared with external raters (CTS: 101±9 vs 90±9; ETD: 25±3 vs 20±5, all p<0.0001).ConclusionsAll examined scales demonstrated good internal consistency, with a slightly better inter-rater reliability for CTS compared with the other tools.

show abstract

“…These assessments were then compared to those of a faculty evaluator. Video review did not improve the correlation of the resident scores to those of the faculty member (Sadosty et al, 2011). In a similar study of the use of video review for students (n=95) in basic life support training, the student assessments did not correlate with the expert evaluation either before or after video review (Vnuk, Owen, & Plummer, 2006).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 82%

Video Review in Self-Assessment of Pharmacy Students’ Communication Skills

Volino¹,

Das²

2014

JEL

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The objectives of this study were to develop a student self-assessment activity of a video-recorded counseling session and evaluate its impact on student self-perceptions of specific communication skills. This activity was incorporated into a core-communications course within the third professional year of a Doctor of Pharmacy curriculum. Student counseling sessions were video-recorded and released to students for self-assessment review. After watching their recorded counseling sessions, students completed an eight-question, paper-based survey which evaluated the impact of self-assessment on communication skill perceptions. Most students (95.6%) agreed or strongly agreed that their self-assessment process was valuable in developing their communication skills. The greatest change in assessment was associated with the use of eye contact (49.5%). Approximately 40% of students noted changes in perceptions for appropriate rate of speech (42.1%), voice volume (39.8%), and facial expressions (37.2%). Overall, self-assessment of video-recorded counseling sessions impacted students' perceptions of both verbal and non-verbal communication skills.

show abstract

Simulation-based Emergency Medicine Resident Self-Assessment

Cited by 28 publications

References 13 publications

Validation of a performance checklist for ultrasound-guided internal jugular central lines for use in procedural instruction and assessment

Validation of a performance checklist for ultrasound-guided internal jugular central lines for use in procedural instruction and assessment

Teamwork evaluation during emergency medicine residents’ high-fidelity simulation

Video Review in Self-Assessment of Pharmacy Students’ Communication Skills

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About