2009 First International Conference on Networks &Amp; Communications 2009
DOI: 10.1109/netcom.2009.31
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulation Based Performance Comparison of Community Model, GFMM, RPGM, Manhattan Model and RWP-SS Mobility Models in MANET

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Este motor cuenta con dos versiones, la primera desarrollada por la Universidad de Carnegie Mellon y la segunda por la Universidad de Michigan. Entre los modelos incluidos en el set dest están el Modelo de punto aleatorio, el modelo de Referencia de Grupo, el modelo de camino libre y el Modelo Manhattan [7].…”
Section: Simulación De Modelos De Movilidadunclassified
“…Este motor cuenta con dos versiones, la primera desarrollada por la Universidad de Carnegie Mellon y la segunda por la Universidad de Michigan. Entre los modelos incluidos en el set dest están el Modelo de punto aleatorio, el modelo de Referencia de Grupo, el modelo de camino libre y el Modelo Manhattan [7].…”
Section: Simulación De Modelos De Movilidadunclassified
“…On the whole, the modeling of the synthetic model is relatively simple; however, this kind of model is limited to the random movement model and does not consider the restriction of the environment [11]. While it is difficult to create a trace model because of the complex behavior logic and low robustness of the model, due to the smaller coverage radius of the 5G cellular network, more access devices, and more complex mobility of network nodes, the traditional mobility models are gradually unable to meet the required performance requirements of simulation [12,13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%