2021
DOI: 10.1037/met0000340
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulation-based sensitivity analysis for causal mediation studies.

Abstract: Causal inference regarding a hypothesized mediation mechanism relies on the assumptions that there are no omitted pretreatment confounders (i.e., confounders preceding the treatment) of the treatment-mediator, treatment-outcome, and mediator-outcome relationships, and there are no posttreatment confounders (i.e., confounders affected by the treatment) of the mediator-outcome relationship. It is crucial to conduct a sensitivity analysis to determine if a potential violation of the assumptions would easily chang… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is therefore judicious to carry out a sensitivity analysis to hidden confounding of the mediator-outcome relations. Methods for a single mediator include Cox et al (2013), Fritz et al (2016, Hong et al (2018), Imai, Keele, and Yamamoto (2010), Liu and Wang (2021), Yang (2021), andSmith andVanderWeele (2019); methods for multiple mediators have recently been developed by Park and Esterling (2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is therefore judicious to carry out a sensitivity analysis to hidden confounding of the mediator-outcome relations. Methods for a single mediator include Cox et al (2013), Fritz et al (2016, Hong et al (2018), Imai, Keele, and Yamamoto (2010), Liu and Wang (2021), Yang (2021), andSmith andVanderWeele (2019); methods for multiple mediators have recently been developed by Park and Esterling (2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although it is one of the predominant methodologies in the social sciences to test for mediation (Sarstedt et al, 2020 ), our use of Hayes PROCESS (Hayes, 2022 ) could not eliminate a limitation that arises with mediation models in general. That is, given the mediator and dependent variable are measured, as opposed to manipulated, the causal relationship between the mediator and the dependent variable cannot be fully established (Hayes, 2022 ; Qin & Yang, 2021 ), even with other statistical approaches to mediation like causal mediation. Since we did not include any confounding variables in Experiment 1B, we were unable to run a sensitivity analysis with our data to understand the extent to which confounding variables affect the relationship between the mediator and the dependent variable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although it is one of the predominant methodologies in the social sciences to test for mediation (Sarstedt et al, 2020), our use of Hayes PROCESS (Hayes, 2022) could not eliminate a limitation that arises with mediation models in general. That is, given the mediator and dependent variable are measured, as opposed to manipulated, the causal relationship between the mediator and the dependent variable cannot be fully established (Hayes, 2022;Qin & Yang, 2021), even with other statistical approaches to mediation like causal mediation.…”
Section: Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We obtained a plausible range of bias due to omitting a pre-exposure confounder that is comparable to the observed ones. In future research, a rigorous sensitivity analysis strategy can be developed for 4-way decomposition analysis by extending an intuitive simulation-based sensitivity analysis method for 2-way decomposition analysis ( 38 ). It will allow one to (1) test for conditional associations of an unmeasured pre-exposure confounder with the exposure, mediator, and outcome, (2) simulate the confounder from its conditional distribution, and (3) assess its influence by comparing the five effect estimates before and after adjusting for it in the analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%