2020
DOI: 10.1161/strokeaha.119.026732
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulation Methods in Acute Stroke Treatment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…15 There is less experience with simulation as an assessment tool in the field of neurology despite a recent call to apply simulation methods to acute stroke treatment. 22 It has been shown to be an effective assessment and educational tool in brain death determination and status epilepticus. [23][24][25][26] In our study, there was an effect of level of training on performance, supporting validity of our simulation case as a sound performance measure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15 There is less experience with simulation as an assessment tool in the field of neurology despite a recent call to apply simulation methods to acute stroke treatment. 22 It has been shown to be an effective assessment and educational tool in brain death determination and status epilepticus. [23][24][25][26] In our study, there was an effect of level of training on performance, supporting validity of our simulation case as a sound performance measure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simulation training could almost certainly help to improve the skills of neurointerventionalists in MeVO EVT and prime them for frequently encountered technical challenges. 31 Unfortunately, at the moment, physician attitudes toward simulation are rather skeptical, and simulation training is regarded by neurointerventionalists as being useful for trainees only, despite ample evidence to the contrary. 32 Finally, the clinical impact of some frequently observed MeVO EVT complications is not entirely clear.…”
Section: Technical Considerations In Mevo Evtmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 Simulation team training has also been shown to improve team functioning-communication and cooperation of different members among a medical team. 4,5 This is particularly important for workflow in the neuroangiography suite because treatment delays at this stage will lead to delayed reperfusion and thereby directly affect patient outcome. It is important to establish continuous monitoring of treatment quality (eg, reperfusion quality and access site complications such as groin hematomas and infections following endovascular treatment) and workflow times (door-to-needle times, door-to-groin puncture times), particularly in a health care crisis, to ensure that treatment quality is maintained to the best of the ability of the system and to detect problems in EVT workflows and treatment quality early on, which grants the medical team the opportunity to intervene in a timely manner.…”
Section: Neuro-icu and Stroke Unitmentioning
confidence: 99%