2015
DOI: 10.3390/f6061779
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulation of CO2 Fluxes in European Forest Ecosystems with the Coupled Soil-Vegetation Process Model “LandscapeDNDC”

Abstract: CO2 exchange processes in forest ecosystems are of profound ecological and economic importance, meaning there is a need for generally applicable simulation tools. However, process-based ecosystem models, which are in principal suitable for the task, are commonly evaluated at only a few sites and for a limited number of plant species. It is thus often unclear if the processes and parameters involved are suitable for model application at a regional scale. We tested the LandscapeDNDC forest growth module PnET (de… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 128 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was initialized with data from the above‐mentioned experimental site. The models' reliability has been shown in the previous studies evaluating C, N, and water balances (Holst et al ., ; Grote et al ., ,b), plant growth for poplar plantations (Werner et al ., ), GHG emissions under the influence of mean commodity crops and poplar plantations (Kim et al ., , ; Kraus et al ., ; Molina‐Herrera et al ., , ; Zhang et al ., ; Díaz‐Pines et al ., ), and NO 3 leaching (Díaz‐Pines et al ., ; Dirnböck et al ., ). For the present study, LandscapeDNDC was run with the physiological model ‘PSIM’ (Physiological Simulation Model) (Grote et al ., ), the soil biogeochemical model ‘DNDC’ (DeNitrification–DeComposition) (Li et al ., , ; Stange et al ., ), the empirical microclimate model ‘ECM’ (Grote et al ., ), and the hydrology module originating from ‘DNDC’ (Li et al ., ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was initialized with data from the above‐mentioned experimental site. The models' reliability has been shown in the previous studies evaluating C, N, and water balances (Holst et al ., ; Grote et al ., ,b), plant growth for poplar plantations (Werner et al ., ), GHG emissions under the influence of mean commodity crops and poplar plantations (Kim et al ., , ; Kraus et al ., ; Molina‐Herrera et al ., , ; Zhang et al ., ; Díaz‐Pines et al ., ), and NO 3 leaching (Díaz‐Pines et al ., ; Dirnböck et al ., ). For the present study, LandscapeDNDC was run with the physiological model ‘PSIM’ (Physiological Simulation Model) (Grote et al ., ), the soil biogeochemical model ‘DNDC’ (DeNitrification–DeComposition) (Li et al ., , ; Stange et al ., ), the empirical microclimate model ‘ECM’ (Grote et al ., ), and the hydrology module originating from ‘DNDC’ (Li et al ., ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Molina-Herrera et al (2015), we optimized for each site three forest structure development and growth parameters: HDMAX which regulates the height diameter ratio for mature trees in dense stands, HREF which defines the canopy depth where full foliage is developed and the KM20 maintenance respiration coefficient at reference temperature following (Thornley and Cannell 2000). The optimization was based on a Markov Chain Monte Carlo calibration minimizing the Euclidian distance (Molina-Herrera et al 2015) between simulation results for tree volume, height and diameter and every 20-30 year values according to the yield tables.…”
Section: Model Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally process descriptions are based on Li et al (1992) and Li et al 2000). LandscapeDNDC was evaluated to represent the water, C and N cycling of various forest ecosystems under different weather and soil conditions (Holst et al 2010;Molina-Herrera et al 2015) and used successfully to simulate nitrate leaching for one of the forest sites (Dirnböck et al 2016). For the current analysis, we used a more detailed forest growth model within LandscapeDNDC (Grote et al 2011a;Grote et al 2011b;Grote et al 2009).…”
Section: Landscapedndc Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations