2019
DOI: 10.1007/s12517-019-4444-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulation of daily suspended sediment load using an improved model of support vector machine and genetic algorithms and particle swarm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Another selected method was the M5Tree model due to its large data handling capability and smaller computational cost than the ANN and SVM models [29]. In recent years, MARS and M5Tree have been applied successfully in modeling runoff and sediment load [31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39]. Malik et al [37] compared the performance of the MARS model with the SVM-based model (least square SVM) and two ANN models (radial basis and self-organizing map neural network) for estimating daily SSL at different gauging stations in Godavari catchment, India.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another selected method was the M5Tree model due to its large data handling capability and smaller computational cost than the ANN and SVM models [29]. In recent years, MARS and M5Tree have been applied successfully in modeling runoff and sediment load [31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39]. Malik et al [37] compared the performance of the MARS model with the SVM-based model (least square SVM) and two ANN models (radial basis and self-organizing map neural network) for estimating daily SSL at different gauging stations in Godavari catchment, India.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They predicted the daily sediment load of the Lighvanchai and Upper Rio Grande rivers by comparing the WM5Tree with ANN and standalone M5Tree models and found that the hybrid M5Tree model outperformed the other models. Rahgoshay et al [36] applied M5Tree, MARS, and hybrid of SVM with GA and particle swarm optimization (PSO) models to predict the sediment load of two earth dams. They found that SVM hybrid models (SVM with GA and SVM with PSO) provided more precise results than the MARS and M5Tree models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these models are mostly built upon the assumption that the process follows a normal distribution, however the streamflow process is generally non-linear and stochastic in nature [13]. Machine learning (ML) models, which have been widely used in recent decades to model many real-world problems [14][15][16][17][18][19][20], have the unique ability to identify the complex non-linear relationships between the predictors (inputs) and targets (outputs) without the need for the physical characterization of the system or the requirement of making any underlying assumptions. Many hybrid ensemble ML models with the integration of different data preprocessing techniques such as wavelet transformations, empirical mode decomposition, etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MARS is a nonparametric regression model that identifies the desired pattern between inputs and desired output in the form of piecewise cubical or linear splines. MARS, M5 model tree, and SVR are models used for the prediction of flows and sediment yields in water resources [38][39][40]. However, the use of MARS is comparatively rare for sediment yield predictions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%