2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2007.04.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulation of fatigue crack growth in components with random defects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The deviation from this relationship is reported to be due to the presence of defects which are larger than a critical size and for material with a Vicker hardness larger than 400 (or a tensile strength > 1300 MPa) [38]. See [39][40][41]38,42,43] for models that describes the influence of crack-like defects on the fatigue strength.…”
Section: Tensile Strength Influencementioning
confidence: 96%
“…The deviation from this relationship is reported to be due to the presence of defects which are larger than a critical size and for material with a Vicker hardness larger than 400 (or a tensile strength > 1300 MPa) [38]. See [39][40][41]38,42,43] for models that describes the influence of crack-like defects on the fatigue strength.…”
Section: Tensile Strength Influencementioning
confidence: 96%
“…will focus on the work of Fjeldstad et al (2008). Their method begins with the observation that manufacturing processes inevitably introduce flaws of various types and magnitudes throughout a material.…”
Section: Real and Imaginary Cracksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors note that, though they are randomly distributed, it is not without constraints; rather, the random distribution is mapped to a particular probability distribution across the structure based on what is known about the manufacturing process and the existing wear on the structure (Fjeldstad et al 2008(Fjeldstad et al , 1187. Looked at in this way, then, the distribution of imaginary cracks (but not necessarily the cracks themselves) is a straightforward idealization -should the probability mapping be replaced with one that more realistically represents the actual distribution of flaws that results from chaotic production processes, then the resulting representational model would always be more accurate, since it would have to rely less on the emergent distribution's statistical representativeness.…”
Section: Imagining Realitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Because of this inhomogeneous and random characteristic, the mechanical performances of castings with shrinkage porosity were uncertain [19,20] . Moreover, the crack growth behaviors were correlated with the probability distributions, such as the number (defect density), size, and location of defects [21,22] . It was complicated to obtain this kind of random-defected material's mechanical function by traditional determinable methods [10,23] .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%