2014
DOI: 10.1007/s40722-014-0006-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulation of floating structure dynamics in waves by implicit coupling of a fully non-linear potential flow model and a rigid body motion approach

Abstract: We demonstrate the accuracy and convergence of a new numerical model solving wave-structure interactions based on the fully non-linear potential flow (FNPF) theory coupled to a rigid body motion approach. This work extends an earlier model proposed by Guerber et al. (Eng Anal Bound Elements 36(7):1151-1163, 2012), restricted to fully submerged structures, by allowing to solve for freely floating bodies on the free surface. Although we are currently extending the model to three dimensions (3D), the work reporte… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such numerical solutions have been shown to agree very well with laboratory experiments, for nonlinear waves propagating up to the breaking point (including wave overturning for Lagrangian models) in deep water or over constant depth, e.g., [5,22,26], and over a varying nearshore bathymetry and topography, e.g., [33,37,44,46,47,55,65,85,88,103]. Similar models have also been used to simulate nonlinear wave interactions with fixed or floating/advancing structure, e.g., [20,48,50,51,57,78,101]. Reviews of such models to date can be found in [32,42].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Such numerical solutions have been shown to agree very well with laboratory experiments, for nonlinear waves propagating up to the breaking point (including wave overturning for Lagrangian models) in deep water or over constant depth, e.g., [5,22,26], and over a varying nearshore bathymetry and topography, e.g., [33,37,44,46,47,55,65,85,88,103]. Similar models have also been used to simulate nonlinear wave interactions with fixed or floating/advancing structure, e.g., [20,48,50,51,57,78,101]. Reviews of such models to date can be found in [32,42].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…In these so-called numerical wave tanks (NWTs; a termed coined by [39]), waves can be generated by internal sources, wavemakers, or other analytical/numerical solutions, e.g., [23,35,37,[42][43][44]46,47,82]. After propagating over an arbitrary bottom and possibly interacting with moving/fixed structures/bodies, e.g., [20,48,51,101], waves are then dissipated in absorbing beaches and/or using actively absorbing boundaries [11][12][13]23,25,26,[35][36][37]48].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, we use an auxiliary BIE to find a more accurate approach. As proposed by Dombre et al [3,33], an analogous BIE for ψ = ∂φ/∂t can be considered. This auxiliary BIE does not increase significantly the computational cost because the discretization is the same as in the main BIE.…”
Section: Hydrodynamic Pressurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, Hannan et al [31,32] studied the interactions between water waves and fully submerged fixed or moving structures. In the same line, but limited to 2D, Dombre et al [33] extended the early work presented in [34] to study the dynamics of free fully submerged structures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Many improved numerical schemes have been devised to handle this coupling, e.g. the acceleration potential method of Tanizawa (1995Tanizawa ( , 1996, the implicit coupled scheme of Dombre et al (2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%