2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.tws.2012.07.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulation of geometric imperfections in cold-formed steel members using spectral representation approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
1
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
30
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Results reflect that, inspite of mode 1 represents the critical buckling mode, it has no remarkable effect on the ultimate moment of short beams, L/r y = 50 and 75, for the practical range of imperfections (0.1-1 t, [2,6,15]). However, the flexural strength of beams with L/r y = 75 reduces by 16% when the imperfection value is equal to 2 t. Note that, the value 2 t is considered a large value.…”
Section: Nonlinear Analysismentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Results reflect that, inspite of mode 1 represents the critical buckling mode, it has no remarkable effect on the ultimate moment of short beams, L/r y = 50 and 75, for the practical range of imperfections (0.1-1 t, [2,6,15]). However, the flexural strength of beams with L/r y = 75 reduces by 16% when the imperfection value is equal to 2 t. Note that, the value 2 t is considered a large value.…”
Section: Nonlinear Analysismentioning
confidence: 82%
“…The data may be used to provide insights on classic out-offlatness, out-of-straightness, and bow, camber, and twist -or more directly on local, distortional, and global deformation modes [23]. The data also provides critical inputs for the proposed 1D modal spectra method [24] -which provides a means to simulate artificial imperfection fields that are realistic, but not directly tied to measurements. The measurement rig has relatively high throughput and has potential for use in manufacturing QA/QC and for developing broad sets of data characterizing expected imperfection magnitudes, as would be appropriate for standards providing guidance on imperfection magnitude for simulation.…”
Section: Imperfection Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this research, the geometric imperfection was not measured due to the lack of appropriate measuring equipment. Based on the research of Zeinoddini and Schafer [15], the magnitude of the imperfection was taken as 0.31 times of the plate thickness, which was in correspondence with 50% probability of exceedance.…”
Section: Finite Element Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%