2010
DOI: 10.3133/sir20105149
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulation of groundwater flow and effects of groundwater irrigation on stream base flow in the Elkhorn and Loup River basins, Nebraska, 1895-2055: Phase Two

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Groundwater elevations along the boundaries of the study domain were determined from water table observations collected in 1995 and were fixed during the simulation. Stanton et al [2010] found the model‐predicted annual base flow and runoff to be consistent with observations. During the simulation period (1940–2005), roughly 2% of the total water entering and 5% of the total water leaving the modeled aquifer was found to flow across the fixed water level boundaries.…”
Section: Study Sitesupporting
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Groundwater elevations along the boundaries of the study domain were determined from water table observations collected in 1995 and were fixed during the simulation. Stanton et al [2010] found the model‐predicted annual base flow and runoff to be consistent with observations. During the simulation period (1940–2005), roughly 2% of the total water entering and 5% of the total water leaving the modeled aquifer was found to flow across the fixed water level boundaries.…”
Section: Study Sitesupporting
confidence: 73%
“…In a recent modeling study, Stanton et al [2010] used a suit of numerical models including MODFLOW 2000 [ Harbaugh , 2005] to examine the regional groundwater dynamics and watershed hydrology of the Loup and Elkhorn River basins. Groundwater elevations along the boundaries of the study domain were determined from water table observations collected in 1995 and were fixed during the simulation.…”
Section: Study Sitementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been reported that, on average, subsurface flow accounts for 30%–40% of the total streamflow for the watershed in which U.S.‐ARM is located (i.e., Salt Fork of the Arkansas River) during the period of the 1940s to present [ Esralew and Lewis , 2010]. At major rivers in Nebraska, including the lower Platte River watershed where the U.S.‐Ne3 site is located, subsurface flow accounts for more than 50% of the total streamflow because of the High Plain aquifer beneath the state [ Stanton et al , 2010].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This assumption is consistent with commonly used groundwater flow models such as the Stream package [ Prudic , ] in MODFLOW‐2000 [ Harbaugh et al ., ]. MODFLOW, along with its associated river and stream packages, has been used in numerous case studies that calculate stream depletion [e.g., Myers et al ., ; Leake et al ., ; Peterson et al ., ; Leake and Pool , ; Stanton et al ., ; Lambert et al ., ]. Thus, an adjoint approach based on the assumptions used in MODFLOW has potential for widespread use.…”
Section: Forward Equations Of Flow and Stream Depletionmentioning
confidence: 99%