2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2012.10.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulation of high speed impact, penetration and fragmentation problems on locally refined Cartesian grids

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
54
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
5
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The extension of a flow field quantity ψ into the ghost region requires the reconstruction of the field in the “real” material. This reconstruction procedure uses a least‐squares approach that can treat arbitrary interface shapes and robustly handles small fragments . Once the ghost values at the points immediately adjacent to the interface are obtained, the field is extended into the narrow level‐set band enclosing the interface to obtain a band of ghost values; further details on the overall procedure can be found in previous works .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The extension of a flow field quantity ψ into the ghost region requires the reconstruction of the field in the “real” material. This reconstruction procedure uses a least‐squares approach that can treat arbitrary interface shapes and robustly handles small fragments . Once the ghost values at the points immediately adjacent to the interface are obtained, the field is extended into the narrow level‐set band enclosing the interface to obtain a band of ghost values; further details on the overall procedure can be found in previous works .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The governing equations and the description of the computational framework used in the current framework have been discussed in detail in previous work . A brief description of the computing methodology is presented here for the sake of completeness.…”
Section: Governing Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of GFM to handle boundary conditions helps to create independent velocity fields in each material, and frictionless sliding can be handled by coupling these fields at the interacting interfaces. In this framework, much like in the explicitly tracked Lagrangian contact formulations, separation between the materials occurs as a natural process of deformation ; that is, separation is not enforced by introducing a void phase in a mixed material but occurs simply as the consequence of evolving the sharp interfaces. This algorithm is purely local in implementation and can be used in a parallel computing framework and can be easily extended to three dimensions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both Lagrangian and Eulerian frameworks have been identified with certain advantages and limitations and take different paths in formulating large deformation problems [4,7,8]. Flow solvers based on a Lagrangian formulation, such as in EPIC [9] and LS-DYNA [10], have the material interface attached to the mesh, which is used to follow the deformation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Those based on an Eulerian formulation, such as HULL [11] and CTH [12], use a fixed mesh and the deformed material flows through the mesh. The Lagrangian methods have to contend with mesh entanglement and the burden of mesh management encountered frequently in large deformation problems making them cumbersome to handle [4,8]. On the other hand, Eulerian methods, which use level sets and ghost fluid approaches, have issues of mass conservation resulting in loss/gain of mass of material while undergoing large deformation [6,13,14,15,16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%