1995
DOI: 10.2466/pms.1995.81.3f.1183
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulation of Human Performance on a Random Generation Task

Abstract: A method was described for simulating human performance on a random generation task. It was illustrated by comparing protocols thus simulated with results produced by humans themselves. Using tests to represent scores on repetition, seriation, and cycling, simulated results were similar to those of actual subjects but differed significantly from scores taken directly from truly random numbers.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Computer simulations of the randomization attempts of different groups of neurological patients may offer one way to h k specific neuronal circuits to specific types of nonrandomness. There are already quite a few studies in which simulation of normal subjects' randomization behavior have been tried (76,100,215,230,250,274).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Computer simulations of the randomization attempts of different groups of neurological patients may offer one way to h k specific neuronal circuits to specific types of nonrandomness. There are already quite a few studies in which simulation of normal subjects' randomization behavior have been tried (76,100,215,230,250,274).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the random number generation (RNG) task, which measures cognitive inhibition (Ginsburg & Karpiuk, 1994, 1995, participants randomly generate numbers ranging from 0 to 9 at a pace of one number per second, as indicated by a metronome. Scoring was based on the indices described by Peters, Giesbrecht, Jelicic, and Merckelbach (2007).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The RNG has been effective in detecting loss of cognitive flexibility in a number of neurological diseases (e.g., Parkinson's disease: Brown et al, 1998;autism: Williams et al, 2002). Several indices have been put forward to measure the various departures from randomness (Ginsburg & Karpiuk, 1995). A factor analysis on RNG data revealed three clusters of random indices: repetition, seriation, and cycling (see Table 1), respectively, related to output inhibition, inhibition of cognitive schemes, and successful monitoring of previous output (Williams et al, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%