2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2014.07.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulation of hydrogen deflagration experiment – Benchmark exercise with lumped-parameter codes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The IBE-3 reached conclusions that can help further investigations on hydrogen distribution. However, as with other benchmarks in the literature (Gallego et al, 2007;Kljenak et al, 2015), it was difficult to draw general conclusions from one participant to another because of the different mesh, solver or physics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The IBE-3 reached conclusions that can help further investigations on hydrogen distribution. However, as with other benchmarks in the literature (Gallego et al, 2007;Kljenak et al, 2015), it was difficult to draw general conclusions from one participant to another because of the different mesh, solver or physics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The program COCOSYS, a lumped-parameter code, is being developed by the Gesellschaft für Anlagen-und Reaktorsicherheit (GRS) gGmbH, Germany, for the simulation of all relevant processes and plant states during severe accidents in containment of light water reactors. And this code is widely used in nuclear engineering [8,9]. The characteristic feature of lumped-parameter approach is that mass and energy are transferred between control volumes by junctions, according to momentum equation solution for each junction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The IBE-3 reached conclusions that can help further investigations on hydrogen distribution. However, as with other benchmarks in the literature like Gallego's or Klejnak, [119,120], it was difficult to draw general conclusions from one participant to another because of the different mesh, solver, simulation settings or physics.…”
Section: Hydrogen Ignitionmentioning
confidence: 99%