1999
DOI: 10.1109/15.809851
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulation of induced current densities in the human body at industrial induction heating frequencies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If we scale the results presented in Fig. 4 by dividing them to the scale factor 1087, they will show a good agreement with results presented in [7]. Slight differences between results may be due to differences in weight and height of actual models.…”
Section: Numerical Resultssupporting
confidence: 71%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…If we scale the results presented in Fig. 4 by dividing them to the scale factor 1087, they will show a good agreement with results presented in [7]. Slight differences between results may be due to differences in weight and height of actual models.…”
Section: Numerical Resultssupporting
confidence: 71%
“…To verify the model, the results are compared with the results presented in [7]. In this work, a pure magnetic field with the vector oriented from front to back of the body is simulated to produce B = 30.7 μT .…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The current density within a homogeneous sphere exposed to a time‐varying uniform B‐field is given (36): where r is the radial distance (m), f is the frequency (Hz), B is the magnetic flux density (T), and σ is the conductivity (S m −1 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even on a supercomputer, the simulation would run for years. To overcome this problem we used the frequency scaling method used in various publications and compared with analytic solutions by several authors (De Moerloose et al 1997, Furse and Gandhi 1998, Gandhi and Chen 1992, Gandhi 1995, Gustrau et al 1999, Potter et al 2000. This method overcomes excessive simulation times and has been successfully applied to low frequency dosimetry simulations.…”
Section: Fdtd Methods For Quasi-static Frequenciesmentioning
confidence: 99%