2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.physc.2015.04.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulation of magnetization process of Pure-type superconductor magnet undulator based on T-method

Abstract: Available online xxxx Keywords: Free Electron Laser (FEL) High Tc superconductor (HTS) Current vector potential method (T-method) Critical state model a b s t r a c tFor the next generation Free Electron Laser, Pure-type undulator made of high Tc superconductors (HTSs) was considered to achieve a small size and high intensity magnetic field undulator. In general, it is very difficult to adjust the undulator magnet alignment after the HTS magnetization since the entire undulator is installed inside a cryostat. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In 2005, Tanaka et al proposed the concept of pure-type BHTSU which utilized a dipole coil to FC magnetize a series of rectangular HTS bulks as shown in figure 12; this new concept was experimentally validated at 59 K with applied field of up to 2 T, but showing a number of technical challenges [96]. A series of modelling works on this SCU concept were later carried out by Yi et al based on the finite difference method (FDM) and on either the critical state model or the E-J power law model [97][98][99], but no more undulator models based on this technology were later developed.…”
Section: 27mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In 2005, Tanaka et al proposed the concept of pure-type BHTSU which utilized a dipole coil to FC magnetize a series of rectangular HTS bulks as shown in figure 12; this new concept was experimentally validated at 59 K with applied field of up to 2 T, but showing a number of technical challenges [96]. A series of modelling works on this SCU concept were later carried out by Yi et al based on the finite difference method (FDM) and on either the critical state model or the E-J power law model [97][98][99], but no more undulator models based on this technology were later developed.…”
Section: 27mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2019, Casalbuoni et al reported the magnetic design of a planar SCU with period length doubling based on the FEM software FEMM [43]. Other numerical methods, like the magnetic energy minimization method and the T-method based FDM, were widely used for the magnetic analysis of pure-type, staggered-array and hybrid PM-HTS bulk SCUs [97,105,108,154].…”
Section: Modelling Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, other numerical methods, including those combined with FEM, have also shown excellent performance in modelling the critical state [37,40,46,50,52]. So far, the numerical analysis of magnetization currents in the BHTSU has been carried out with the 3D H-formulation [81,82], the MEM method [83], the RAA-combined T-Ω formulation [45,46,84], and the recently proposed backward computation method [52]. In particular, the backward computation method has shown excellent performance in simulating the magnetization currents in a periodical BHTSU model with 1.8 million DOFs within 1.4 h [52].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%