2016
DOI: 10.1109/tap.2016.2601347
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulation of Metasurfaces in Finite Difference Techniques

Abstract: Abstract-We introduce a rigorous and simple method for analyzing metasurfaces, modeled as zero-thickness electromagnetic sheets, in Finite Difference (FD) techniques. The method consists in describing the spatial discontinuity induced by the metasurface as a virtual structure, located between nodal rows of the Yee grid, using a finite difference version of Generalized Sheet Transition Conditions (GSTCs). In contrast to previously reported approaches, the proposed method can handle sheets exhibiting both electr… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
95
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(95 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
95
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where 0 and µ 0 are the permittivity and permeability of free space, respectively, and χ ee , χ mm , χ em , and χ me represent the electric/magnetic (first subscript) surface susceptibility tensors describing the response to electric/magnetic (second subscript) field excitations [40]. The average fields on the surface Σ of the metasurface are defined as…”
Section: Metasurface Fundamentalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…where 0 and µ 0 are the permittivity and permeability of free space, respectively, and χ ee , χ mm , χ em , and χ me represent the electric/magnetic (first subscript) surface susceptibility tensors describing the response to electric/magnetic (second subscript) field excitations [40]. The average fields on the surface Σ of the metasurface are defined as…”
Section: Metasurface Fundamentalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since all fields are TE z , the system in (3) can be simplified and the metasurface can be represented by only four unknown susceptibility terms. Furthermore, we stipulate that there is no magnetoelectric coupling for simplicity, resulting in χ em = χ me = 0 [40]. With this choice, the unknown susceptibility tensors reduce to…”
Section: A 2d Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where the symbol ∆ and the subscript 'av' represent the differences and averages of the tangential electric or magnetic fields at both sides of the metasurface, and χ ee , χ mm , χ em , χ me are the bianisotropic susceptibility tensors characterizing the metasurface. Figure 1(b) plots the FDFD-simulated [9] fields propagating across a uniform nonreciprocal phase shifting metasurface with phase difference ∆φ = 180 • , corresponding to a spatial gyrator. The corresponding susceptiblities for an x-polarized incident wave are obtained from (1) as…”
Section: Nonreciprocal Phase Shifting Metasurfacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…to maximize the overall LED PCE. The full-wave simulations will be performed using the COMSOL finite element method (FEM) commercial software, where the metasurface is modeled as a deeply sub-wavelength slab with volume susceptibilityχ vol =χ/δ , where δ is the thickness of the slab [21]. Given the high density of the FEM mesh required in the metasurface-modeling slab and around the (point) dipole, the actual 3D problem is not tractable on a standard computer.…”
Section: Principle Of the Prmc Ledmentioning
confidence: 99%