2013
DOI: 10.1785/0120120203
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulation of Multiple-Station Ground Motions Using Stochastic Point-Source Method with Spatial Coherency and Correlation Characteristics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The spatial correlation model that we develop in this study for the wavelet parameters extends the Yamamoto–Baker model to regional‐scale applications, by simulating spatially correlated ground motions at multiple locations for a given scenario earthquake. It is interesting to mention that the previous scope of work has also been attempted in a recent study using stochastic point‐source simulation , where the point‐source model is modified to prescribe a spatial correlation and coherency structure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The spatial correlation model that we develop in this study for the wavelet parameters extends the Yamamoto–Baker model to regional‐scale applications, by simulating spatially correlated ground motions at multiple locations for a given scenario earthquake. It is interesting to mention that the previous scope of work has also been attempted in a recent study using stochastic point‐source simulation , where the point‐source model is modified to prescribe a spatial correlation and coherency structure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model capability is verified in blind tests by comparing simulated ground motions with the actual recorded data. It is also worth pointing out that, if not unlikely, it is not entirely clear how the conditional simulation could be conducted using the point‐source model in .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where r Aj represents the spatially correlated disturbance in the FAS for the j-th recording station (or support), for a given seismic event, as well as the relation between M 0 and M are given in Table 1 and the selected model parameters are discussed in Liu and Hong. 12 The spatially correlated disturbance r Aj was assessed based on values of the integral of the FAS of the record to the integral of Y(M 0 , R, f). For the Chi-Chi earthquake, it was concluded 12 that ln(r Aj ) could be adequately modelled as a normal variate with zero mean and standard deviation equal to 0.523, and ln(r Aj ) at different sites are correlated with the following empirical spatial correlation, ρ r (Δ)…”
Section: Simulation Of Multiple-support Excitation For a Scenario Eventmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The coherence function of two ground motion records at spatially located stations (supports) for a seismic event depends on the frequency and coherence alone does not result in the simulated records matching the observed spatial correlation of PGA and of SAs. 12 The coherence models are often considered in the estimation of the seismic responses of structures or structural systems with multiple supports. [13][14][15][16][17][18][19] In these studies, simulated ground motion records are used since the available historical records are insufficient for selecting the records matching inter-support distances of a structure, desired seismic magnitude (or intensity) and site to seismic source distance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of statistical analysis (Liu and Hong, 2013;Hong and Liu, 2014) suggested that ln(r Ap,j ) could be modeled as a normal variate with the SD equals 0.523 and ρ mm,jk (Δ) can be modeled using, ρ mm,jk (Δ) = exp…”
Section: Model Parameter Parameter Value and Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%