2003
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-18237-2_15
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulation of Sedimentary Basins

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Modeling provided Data provided Intrusion thickness Normalized aureole Lithology of host-rock Barker and Bone (1995) V b -Da 2.2 m $5% D High grade limestone Barker et al (1998) T-F-L C V 0.06 -40 m 30-150% a D Clay/sediments Bishop and Abbott (1995) T V-TOC-RE-GC 0.3-3.0 m 30-70% a D Shale/silty shale Brown et al (1994) T-Ro V 40-60 m 150% a S Shale/limestone Bostick and Pawlewicz (1984) V 3.6-10.4 m 75-100% a D Shale/limestone Clayton and Bostick (1986) V-RE-GC-Da 1.3 m $50% a D Siltstone Cooper et al (2007) V-TOC-Da 0.15-1.8 m 75-110% a S/D Coal/black shale Delaney (1982) T Drits et al (2007) Mi 0.5-80 m $75% b S Mudstone Dutrow et al (2001) T-F-R TOC-Da 11 m 35-55% b D Carbonate/siltstone Finkelman et al (1998) V-RE-El-Mi 1.5 m $35% a D Coal/coke Fjeldskaar et al (2008) T-Ro V 118.5 m $150% c S Silt/shale/sandstone Galushkin (1997) T-F-L C -L D -Ro V 0.9-118.5 m 55-170% a S/D Black shale/silt George (1992) V-RE-GC-Da 3.5 m $70% a D Silt/oil shale Golab et al (2007) Mi Hanson and Barton (1989) T-L C -L D D Jaeger (1959) T-F-L V 100% c Kjeldstad et al (2003) T-F-P-Ro Litvinovski et al (1990) T-L M -P 500 m >>10% b D Clay/pumice Mastalerz et al (2009) V-Da >1.2 m $50% a D Coal Meyers and Simoneit (1999) TOC-RE-Da 1.5 m $60% b S Coal Othman et al (2001) V-RE-GC 0.40-15.7 m S Mudstone Perregaard and Schiener (1979) V-GC 4.5 m $50% a D Shale Peters et al (1983) V-RE-GC 0.2-15 m 50-70% a S Black shale Polyansky and Reverdatto (2006) T-L M -F-R 280 m 10-70% c S Sand/siltstone Raymond and Murchison (1988) V 50-118.5 m $100-200% a S Shale/silt/limestone Rodriguez Monreal et al (2009) T-Ro-HC V-RE-GC 110-600 m 50-100% a S Black shale Santos et al (2009) T Mi-El 13 m $90% b S Carbonate/ black shale Saxby and Stephenson (1987) TOC-GC-Da 3 m $50% b S Oil shale Simoneit et al (1978Simoneit et al ( , 1981 V-TOC-GC-Da 0.2-15 m 40-50% a ...…”
Section: Referencesmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Modeling provided Data provided Intrusion thickness Normalized aureole Lithology of host-rock Barker and Bone (1995) V b -Da 2.2 m $5% D High grade limestone Barker et al (1998) T-F-L C V 0.06 -40 m 30-150% a D Clay/sediments Bishop and Abbott (1995) T V-TOC-RE-GC 0.3-3.0 m 30-70% a D Shale/silty shale Brown et al (1994) T-Ro V 40-60 m 150% a S Shale/limestone Bostick and Pawlewicz (1984) V 3.6-10.4 m 75-100% a D Shale/limestone Clayton and Bostick (1986) V-RE-GC-Da 1.3 m $50% a D Siltstone Cooper et al (2007) V-TOC-Da 0.15-1.8 m 75-110% a S/D Coal/black shale Delaney (1982) T Drits et al (2007) Mi 0.5-80 m $75% b S Mudstone Dutrow et al (2001) T-F-R TOC-Da 11 m 35-55% b D Carbonate/siltstone Finkelman et al (1998) V-RE-El-Mi 1.5 m $35% a D Coal/coke Fjeldskaar et al (2008) T-Ro V 118.5 m $150% c S Silt/shale/sandstone Galushkin (1997) T-F-L C -L D -Ro V 0.9-118.5 m 55-170% a S/D Black shale/silt George (1992) V-RE-GC-Da 3.5 m $70% a D Silt/oil shale Golab et al (2007) Mi Hanson and Barton (1989) T-L C -L D D Jaeger (1959) T-F-L V 100% c Kjeldstad et al (2003) T-F-P-Ro Litvinovski et al (1990) T-L M -P 500 m >>10% b D Clay/pumice Mastalerz et al (2009) V-Da >1.2 m $50% a D Coal Meyers and Simoneit (1999) TOC-RE-Da 1.5 m $60% b S Coal Othman et al (2001) V-RE-GC 0.40-15.7 m S Mudstone Perregaard and Schiener (1979) V-GC 4.5 m $50% a D Shale Peters et al (1983) V-RE-GC 0.2-15 m 50-70% a S Black shale Polyansky and Reverdatto (2006) T-L M -F-R 280 m 10-70% c S Sand/siltstone Raymond and Murchison (1988) V 50-118.5 m $100-200% a S Shale/silt/limestone Rodriguez Monreal et al (2009) T-Ro-HC V-RE-GC 110-600 m 50-100% a S Black shale Santos et al (2009) T Mi-El 13 m $90% b S Carbonate/ black shale Saxby and Stephenson (1987) TOC-GC-Da 3 m $50% b S Oil shale Simoneit et al (1978Simoneit et al ( , 1981 V-TOC-GC-Da 0.2-15 m 40-50% a ...…”
Section: Referencesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The great span in this parameter in published aureole data suggests an influence of several factors, for example degree of background maturation, varying temperature of intrusion contact, different fluid systems, or multiple intrusions (e.g. Raymond and Murchison, 1988;Barker et al, 1998;Kjeldstad et al, 2003). To constrain some of these variations and how they influence the aureole processes, we test how key parameters (intrusion temperature, host-rock temperature and sill thickness) affect both the aureole thickness and the mass of generated gases during heating.…”
Section: Contact Metamorphism Of Organic Materialsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…During volcanic events large amounts of magma are emplaced into the sedimentary basins instead of reaching the surface. Such intrusions heat up the sediments and rapidly expel the pore fluids inducing prolonged fluid flow systems (Kjeldstad et al 2002;Svensen et al 2003Svensen et al , 2004. If the intrusions affect Figure 3.…”
Section: (B ) Volcanism Controlled Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A calibrated kerogen cracking model considering the breaking of different kerogen bounds (Sweeney & Burnham, 1990) allows to calculate the amount of thermogenic gas that is converted from the total organic carbon (TOC) present in the host-rock. This kerogen cracking model has been used to estimate the degassing caused by contact metamorphism within the contact aureole around cooling sills (Iyer et al, 2018;Iyer et al, 2017;Iyer et al, 2013;Aarnes et al, 2015;Aarnes et al, 2011;Aarnes et al, 2010;Kjeldstad et al, 2003). To provide a potential basin-scale degassing estimate, the surface area of sill intrusions in the sedimentary basin of interest, for example,~85,000 km 2 in the Vøring and Møre Basins (offshore Norway, Svensen et al, 2004) and~370,000 km 2 in the Karoo Basin (South Africa, Svensen et al, 2017), is used to upscale the quantitative results obtained from a single cooling sill model (e.g., Aarnes et al, 2010;Iyer et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%