2011
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.84.174428
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulation of spin-polarized scanning tunneling microscopy on complex magnetic surfaces: Case of a Cr monolayer on Ag(111)

Abstract: We propose an atom-superposition-based method for simulating spin-polarized scanning tunneling microscopy (SP-STM) from first principles. Our approach provides bias-dependent STM images in high spatial resolution, with the capability of using either constant current or constant height modes of STM. In addition, topographic and magnetic contributions can clearly be distinguished, which are directly comparable to results of SP-STM experiments in the differential magnetic mode. Advantages of the proposed method a… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
93
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

4
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(95 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
(142 reference statements)
2
93
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that the total current contains both topographic and magnetic contributions, therefore z(x, y) will be the simulated SP-STM image [56,90]. In the presented model its bias and temperature dependence is considered as well.…”
Section: Currentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Note that the total current contains both topographic and magnetic contributions, therefore z(x, y) will be the simulated SP-STM image [56,90]. In the presented model its bias and temperature dependence is considered as well.…”
Section: Currentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It seems to be straightforward that a constant TOPO current contour is closer to this constant tunneling transmission criterion than a constant TOTAL current contour due to the appearance of spin dependent effects in the latter one. On the other hand, the calculation of any current contour is simple within the presented 3D WKB approach [56]. Since the I TOPO = const experimental method is not routinely available at the moment, we restrict ourselves to consider the I TOTAL = const contours when calculating the 2D differential conductance maps, and examples will be shown in Section 3.8.…”
Section: Differential Conductancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations