1982
DOI: 10.1080/01418618208236930
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulation of the (001) plane crack in α-iron employing a new boundary scheme

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
70
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
70
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result, the framework of multiscale/ multiphysics (MSMP) methods has emerged [1][2][3] which, in the area of materials behavior includes two categories, namely, sequential and concurrent. In sequential multiscaling methods [1,2], simulations are performed at a fine/ atomic scale and the fundamental material properties obtained at these scales are used in the coarse scale/ continuum level simulations. In general, fine scale simulations are inherently stochastic, thereby an appropriate quantification of uncertainty associated with material properties requires a large number of simulations, and each simulation is typically by itself computationally demanding.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As a result, the framework of multiscale/ multiphysics (MSMP) methods has emerged [1][2][3] which, in the area of materials behavior includes two categories, namely, sequential and concurrent. In sequential multiscaling methods [1,2], simulations are performed at a fine/ atomic scale and the fundamental material properties obtained at these scales are used in the coarse scale/ continuum level simulations. In general, fine scale simulations are inherently stochastic, thereby an appropriate quantification of uncertainty associated with material properties requires a large number of simulations, and each simulation is typically by itself computationally demanding.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wavelet based methods form a viable concurrent multiscale modeling toolbox [1][2][3][6][7][8][9]. They substantially reduce the computational overhead, without compromising accuracy, required to transfer information from one physical scale to another.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early work featured one-way [9][10][11][12][13][14] or two-way [15][16][17][18][19] coupled methods, in which displacement fields established at the interface between continuum and atomistic regions were computed either from sophisticated interfacial conditions or from initial conditions derived from continuum elasticity theory. Increases in computing power permitted more realistic two-way couplings, whereby atomistic fields were permitted to affect the far-field elastic continua through the latter's discretization with finite elements [20][21][22][23]. Such improvements in the coupling algorithms enabled description of dynamic crack growth [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although some early work attempted to parameterize stress-strain relationships in the far-field region with atomic potentials [20][21][22], more efficient considerations of selected atomistic effects on material behavior were achieved through the initial developments of the quasicontinuum theory [26][27][28] that employed hyperelastic constitutive behavior, derived from atomistic potentials, for the overlaying finite elements. In the subsequent decade, significant new developments in methodologies have improved the fidelity of atomistically informed, continuum multiscale computational methods [29][30][31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Coupled methods, e.g. multi-scale methods, usually couple atomistic mechanics or quantum theory and classical continuum mechanics [11][12][13]. A comprehensive review of such methods is given in [14,15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%