2015
DOI: 10.3133/sir20155153
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulation of the effects of different inflows on hydrologic conditions in Lake Houston with a three-dimensional hydrodynamic model, Houston, Texas, 2009–10

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As mentioned earlier, four primary statistics were used to evaluate the degree of fit for the EFDC model described in this report, including MAE, RMSE, NRMSE, and the IA. Based on previous USGS calibration efforts, the MAE, RMSE, and NRMSE are common metrics used for model calibration and have been used frequently by the USGS in other model calibrations (for example, Sullivan and Rounds, 2004;Galloway and Green, 2007;Rendon and Lee, 2015). Although these metrics do not directly focus on the model performance, these metrics are appropriate for quantifying the error between the measured and simulated data.…”
Section: Hydrodynamic Model Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As mentioned earlier, four primary statistics were used to evaluate the degree of fit for the EFDC model described in this report, including MAE, RMSE, NRMSE, and the IA. Based on previous USGS calibration efforts, the MAE, RMSE, and NRMSE are common metrics used for model calibration and have been used frequently by the USGS in other model calibrations (for example, Sullivan and Rounds, 2004;Galloway and Green, 2007;Rendon and Lee, 2015). Although these metrics do not directly focus on the model performance, these metrics are appropriate for quantifying the error between the measured and simulated data.…”
Section: Hydrodynamic Model Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is difficult to ascertain the depth characteristics of simulated salinity values for the Bushy Park Reservoir model, given no continuous calibration records are present with multiple sample depths. For example, the Lake Houston EFDC model (Rendon and Lee, 2015;Smith and Shah, 2020) had continuous measurements for four different depths at two different locations as calibration targets to determine the model capacity to replicate salinity with depth. Whereas this capacity may not be as important for shallow areas, stations with multiple sample depths for deeper locations (such as closer to Charleston Harbor), multiple calibration depths would be beneficial for model simulation.…”
Section: Salinitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To reduce groundwater usage, regional water suppliers have been gradually switching to surface water resources in compliance with the mandates set by the Harris-Galveston Subsidence District (HGSD 2020). For the City of Houston (hereinafter referred to as Houston), about 71% of Houston's water supply comes from surface-water resources (Rendon and Lee 2015), as of 2015. As part of its network of surface-water resources, Houston has partial or complete rights to three reservoirs with Hydrodynamic Modeling Results 66 have increased NEWPP withdrawals and a drought similar to 2011's, the decreases in water levels could become even more problematic with the additional withdrawals (Combs 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hydrodynamic models have been successfully applied in the past to simulate the dynamic hydrology and chemistry of large water bodies such as Lake Houston (Jin et al 2007;Dynamic Solutions 2013). In 2015, the U.S. Geological Survey developed such a tool, a three-dimensional circulation, temperature, and salinity transport model for Lake Houston (Rendon and Lee 2015) using the Environmental Fluid Dynamics Code (EFDC) modeling package (Hamrick 1992;Hamrick 1996). As this model also simulates salinity, the salinity can be related back to specific conductance and therefore can be used as an evaluation tool for changes in dissolved ion concentrations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation