1999
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-246x.1999.00940.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulation of the spontaneous growth of a dynamic crack without constraints on the crack tip path

Abstract: The spontaneous growth of a dynamic in-plane shear crack is simulated using a newly developed method of analysis in which no a priori constraint is required for the crack tip path, unlike in other classical studies. We formulate the problem in terms of boundary integral equations; the hypersingularities of the integration kernels are removed by taking the finite parts. Our analysis shows that dynamic crack growth is spontaneously arrested soon after the bending of the crack tips, even in a uniformly stressed m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
80
3

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
5
80
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, dynamic rupture growth in a poroelastic medium is generally independent of n. The preliminary conclusion is that we may be able to get some constraints on the values of poroelastic constants of fault zone material from observation of the directions of coseismic and postseismic fault tip extensions. However, it is still premature to make such estimate in this paper because of the assumptions G 1 = G 2 and c 1 = c 2 and of simple model geometry; in a more realistic treatment we may have to take account of fault zone structure around a fault [e.g., Chester et al, 1993] and/or bending and branching of fault [Kame and Yamashita, 1999;Ando et al, 2004].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, dynamic rupture growth in a poroelastic medium is generally independent of n. The preliminary conclusion is that we may be able to get some constraints on the values of poroelastic constants of fault zone material from observation of the directions of coseismic and postseismic fault tip extensions. However, it is still premature to make such estimate in this paper because of the assumptions G 1 = G 2 and c 1 = c 2 and of simple model geometry; in a more realistic treatment we may have to take account of fault zone structure around a fault [e.g., Chester et al, 1993] and/or bending and branching of fault [Kame and Yamashita, 1999;Ando et al, 2004].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The boundary integral equation method (BIEM) has been quite popular for crack and rupture propagation problems (Das, 1980;Andrews, 1985;Das and Kostrov, 1988;Perrin et al, 1995;Geubelle and Rice, 1995;Kame and Yamashita, 1999;Aochi et al, 2000;Lapusta et al, 2000;Day et al, 2005;Noda et al, 2009). BIEM reduces the problem to solving only for the solution along the fault, with the material response entering through convolutions over the past history of slip or tractions on the fault.…”
Section: Related Work On Seismic Wave Propagation and Dynamic Rupturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, it can be difficult to develop well-conditioned multi-block decompositions of geometries that arise in realistic fault systems. Boundary integral equation methods (e.g., [3,4,28,59]) have also been developed. Though these methods are extremely efficient for simple geometries, they are currently unable to account for heterogeneity in the material as well as topography, and some suffer from numerical instabilities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%