2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2020.167221
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulation tool for the Eddy current magnetic signature (EC-MS) non-destructive method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In parallel to this first experimental setup, a hysteresis cycle characterization setup was exploited to plot the tested specimen hysteresis cycles required for the validation of the method. A detailed description of this setup can be found in [22]. The tested specimens were all coming from the same batch.…”
Section: -A) Magnetic Incremental Permeability Characterization Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In parallel to this first experimental setup, a hysteresis cycle characterization setup was exploited to plot the tested specimen hysteresis cycles required for the validation of the method. A detailed description of this setup can be found in [22]. The tested specimens were all coming from the same batch.…”
Section: -A) Magnetic Incremental Permeability Characterization Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [22], we proposed a simple modification of the J-A model to describe quasi simultaneously a B(H) hysteresis cycle and the associated | |( ) MIP butterfly loop. In this method, the J-A model is excited with a high amplitude alternative magnetic field H and for every step time both the differential and the incremental magnetic permeability are calculated.…”
Section: -A) Modified Jiles-atherton Model For a Fast Simulation Of The Magnetic Incremental Permeabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They are kept afterwards for the simulation of the MBNenergy(H) cycles. The α, k and c adjusted combination is set through an optimization method based on an error function (for details, see[28][37][49]). Fig.6 -a, b and c depict FeCo RN, FeCo FP10 and FeSi response along rolling direction, respectively.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, the MIP curve is the modulus of coil impedance as a function of the applied magnetic field, but the EC-MS signal is the Lissajous trajectory of the coil impedance on a complex plane. The size, length, and direction of the signature depend on the residual stress of the steel [8,9,10,11].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%