1990
DOI: 10.1353/sls.1990.0019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simultaneous Communication: The State of the Art & Proposals for Change

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The early 1980s saw the implementation of process-oriented approaches to teaching writing [79], a move that was consistent with the more general shift to a whole language philosophy in literacy instruction in which there is an emphasis on using language purposefully and communicatively with language accuracy taking a backseat to making meaning [80]. While this pedagogical shift effected some positive change in the quality of writing done by deaf students (e.g., less formulaic, greater focus on content), achievement was still not age and grade appropriate with the writing continuing to exhibit many of the same lexical, morphological, and syntactical issues of the past [81].…”
Section: Intervention Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The early 1980s saw the implementation of process-oriented approaches to teaching writing [79], a move that was consistent with the more general shift to a whole language philosophy in literacy instruction in which there is an emphasis on using language purposefully and communicatively with language accuracy taking a backseat to making meaning [80]. While this pedagogical shift effected some positive change in the quality of writing done by deaf students (e.g., less formulaic, greater focus on content), achievement was still not age and grade appropriate with the writing continuing to exhibit many of the same lexical, morphological, and syntactical issues of the past [81].…”
Section: Intervention Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SimCom is a forced and artificial attempt to sign along with speech, often used in educational settings for the Deaf. In such contexts, the sign is usually some form of Sign Supported Speech, that is, an attempt to represent the spoken language on the hands (Maxwell, 1990). This type of SimCom is speech-driven, and while English grammar is not fully represented (Marmor & Petitto, 1979), typically the signing is far from natural ASL, and the signed content may be only 75% of the spoken content (Mallery-Ruganis & Fischer, 1991).…”
Section: Code-switching and Code-blendingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rationale for this limitation is twofold: We have completed a number of speech experiments that permit us to draw valid and reliable conclusions, and the answers to questions concerning other issues are beyond the purview of the research reviewed here and should be addressed by summaries of experimental research in other areas, such as linguistics, education, or motor learning. Reviews of research in some of these other areas of interest may be found in Stewart (1989, 1998), Maxwell (1990), Moores (1996), and Strong and Charlson (1987).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of SC is a controversial issue, and its pros and cons have remained the subject of continuing debate (Hyde, Power, & Leigh, 1998;Marmor & Petitto, 1979;Maxwell, 1990;Strong & Charlson, 1987). Vernon and Andrews (1990) outlined the advantages of SC in opening a variety of modes of communication for deaf children, providing more accurate representation of English than that provided by lipreading alone and contributing beneficial effects in psychosocial and linguistic development.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%