2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0378-4347(00)00386-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simultaneous determination of bosentan and its three major metabolites in various biological matrices and species using narrow bore liquid chromatography with ion spray tandem mass spectrometric detection.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The analysis of rat plasma samples and samples from in vitro experiments was done with LC-MS/MS using a modified method published previously (Lausecker et al, 2000). Plasma and microsomal proteins were precipitated with ice-cold acetonitrile containing known quantities of the tetra-deuterated analogs of bosentan and its metabolites Ro 48-5033 and Ro 47-8634 as internal standards, vortexing for 20 min, and centrifugation at 4000 rpm for 10 min at 4°C.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analysis of rat plasma samples and samples from in vitro experiments was done with LC-MS/MS using a modified method published previously (Lausecker et al, 2000). Plasma and microsomal proteins were precipitated with ice-cold acetonitrile containing known quantities of the tetra-deuterated analogs of bosentan and its metabolites Ro 48-5033 and Ro 47-8634 as internal standards, vortexing for 20 min, and centrifugation at 4000 rpm for 10 min at 4°C.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As seen in Table 8, the previously proposed method 30 is not able to cover the therapeutic range and this complementary work is conducted to decrease the LOQs and provides a practical analytical method to determine bosentan without interference from other compounds present in the samples. In the literature, 6,7,9 two kinds of sample preparation methods such as liquid-liquid extraction and solid phase extraction have been developed. Nevertheless, these conventional extraction methods are time-consuming and require large volumes of samples and toxic organic solvents.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DLLME and USAEME are easy, solvent and cost saving procedures. In spite of developments in modern analytical instruments [6][7][8][9] with better LLOQs and linearity ranges, high cost of analysis make them not applicable for routine clinical applications. These microextraction methods also provided reasonable results for extraction of aluminum from urine samples after complexation with 8-hydroxy quinoline.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The reported methods are sensitive but are having disadvantages like a narrow range of linear response, more retention time and lesser precision. Two narrow-bore LC-MS methods were reported (Lausecker et al, 1995, Lausecker et al, 2000. The reported LC-MS methods involve costly detector and tiresome sample preparation steps.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%