2004
DOI: 10.1080/1350748042000240541
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simultaneous love: an argument on love, modernity and the feminist subject at the beginning of the twentieth century

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Permanence cannot be forced on a relationship from without. If a caring, supportive, and companionate role is to be accepted by women, it must be inspired and sustained by an unconditional and enduring love of the type described by Factor B, not enforced by gender roles or ‘propped up’ by the institutional scaffolding of marriage (Arni, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Permanence cannot be forced on a relationship from without. If a caring, supportive, and companionate role is to be accepted by women, it must be inspired and sustained by an unconditional and enduring love of the type described by Factor B, not enforced by gender roles or ‘propped up’ by the institutional scaffolding of marriage (Arni, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Factor C understands love in passionate terms, as a powerful and short‐term feeling driven primarily by the pursuit of sex, fun, and excitement. This historically masculine emphasis on the potentially uncontrollable and anarchical feelings of passionate love has long been considered a threat to the stability of intimate relationships (Arni, ). It makes sense, therefore, that Factor C goes on to exploit these qualities as a means of challenging the whole idea of exclusive companionship.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The emergence of new marriage ideals is coincident with the rise of values of individualism, choice, and equality in Western modernity. Twentieth-century debates about the incompatibility of passionate love and the institution of marriage have been framed in terms of modernity, even though this question was debated in Europe beginning in the twelfth century (Arni 2004). According to Caroline Arni, at the beginning of the twentieth century in German-speaking countries, love gained authenticity as an egalitarianand modernrelationship between individuals who chose mates based on personal characteristics, not for material interest, social convention, or stability.…”
Section: Arranged Marriage As Premodern and Patriarchalmentioning
confidence: 99%