JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.The University of Chicago Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Signs. Arranging Love: Interrogating the Vantage Point in Cross-Border Feminism issues of cultural difference and relativism remain fraught ones in feminist teaching and research. Transnational feminists based in the United States have grappled with the question of how to work across national borders without reinforcing colonial tropes and practices (Mohanty 1988, 2003; Grewal and Kaplan 1994, 2001). Feminist scholars have criticized the way particular gendered practices of postcolonial societies are singled out as representing the society writ large, exoticized and sensationalized, while practices that are either more egalitarian or more familiar to a U.S. audience remain invisible. For example, they have eloquently critiqued discourses of sari and dowry (Narayan 1997, 1998), veiling (Abu-Lughod 2002), and female circumcision (Nnaemeka 2005). In my view, however, feminist scholars have yet to fully address the challenges of cross-border analysis. Most people in the United States, including students, the general public, and some feminists, consistently overestimate their own agency in the face of discursive and institutional structures and underestimate that of women elsewhereand this occurs in a contemporary U.S. context where agency defines personhood. Discourses of exaggerated cultural difference serve national interests, and feminist scholars have pursued various strategies to undo them. A conventional comparative approach that assumes cultures to be distinct from one another (only different entities are comparable) has led some scholars to highlight the empowering aspects of cultural practices in order to counter ethnocentric discourses about foreign (and domestic) others. For example, one might explore the political and I am indebted to SIGNS Spring 2009 I 585 is central not only to externally imposed stereotypes of India but also to diasporic Indian identity, whether experienced positively or as a source of generational conflict (Baumann 1996, 153; Raj 2003, 106). As Sandhya Shukla writes in India Abroad, "Arranged marriages, in particular, are central to the production of meaning of ethnic community in a variety of ways. Not only do they describe a basic form of reproduction of that community and retention of certain forms of membership, but they also function as hyper-symptoms of misrecognition between East and West, that which continues to make immigrant communities, especially in Britain and the United States, unknowable, exotic, and mired in tradition" (Shukla 2003, 223). Tensions between arranged marriage and romantic desire are pivotal to the narratives and humor of ...