2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.12.041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simultaneous modulated accelerated radiation therapy in the treatment of nasopharyngeal cancer: A local center’s experience

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
40
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
4
40
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The doses prescribed to gross target volume (GTV) and clinical target volume (CTV) were 2.5 and 2.0 Gy per fraction with a total dose of 70 and 60 Gy delivered in 28 fractions within 6 weeks, respectively. The delineation of GTV, CTV and dose-volume constraints of normal tissue was presented in our previous report (15). All patients received IMRT as definitive treatment without concurrent chemotherapy.…”
Section: Patient Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The doses prescribed to gross target volume (GTV) and clinical target volume (CTV) were 2.5 and 2.0 Gy per fraction with a total dose of 70 and 60 Gy delivered in 28 fractions within 6 weeks, respectively. The delineation of GTV, CTV and dose-volume constraints of normal tissue was presented in our previous report (15). All patients received IMRT as definitive treatment without concurrent chemotherapy.…”
Section: Patient Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Local control rates at 5 years have similarly improved from 60-70% to 85%. Preliminary reports of contemporary series treated with intensity-modulated RT (IMRT), based on shorter follow-up, showed even better results, with local control rates greater than 90% at 2 to 4 years and survival rates averaging 90% at 3 years (6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14). Similar impressive results were obtained in small series of patients treated in Phase II studies of induction CHT followed by concomitant chemoradiation (15,16) We previously reported on the improvement of outcome of NPC in a consecutive series of 171 patients treated at a single institution over a period of 10 years (1990-1999) (17).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prescribing a dose per fraction (at least in some patients) higher than the one normally used may represent a limitation of our analysis. However, it should be noted that the use of dose per fraction .2.2 Gy (up to 2.5 Gy/fraction) has been repeatedly proposed and tested in the treatment of nasopharyngeal 38,39 and other head-neck carcinomas. 40,41 In addition, the use of high doses per fraction on the GTV simultaneously with the reduction of the dose to the SWOARs made it more challenging the possibility of achieving deep dose gradients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%