2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2010.11.052
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simultaneous monitoring of excitatory postsynaptic potentials and extracellular l-glutamate in mouse hippocampal slices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
7
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The tip of the capillary sensor can be positioned in the middle between stimulation and recording electrodes for fEPSP measurements. The example of simultaneous measurements at CA1 of a hippocampal slice demonstrates that although no significant changes in a glutamate current is detected by application of 0.052 Hz (test stimuli), a transient change in the current is observed by application of 2 Hz stimulation, indicating enhanced release of L-glutamate in CA1 region (Hozumi et al, 2011). The Lglutamate level in region CA1 at 2 Hz stimulation obtained by in situ calibration ranged from 0.8 to 2.2 M (1.4 M as an average) from 5 independent measurements.…”
Section: Electric Stimulationmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The tip of the capillary sensor can be positioned in the middle between stimulation and recording electrodes for fEPSP measurements. The example of simultaneous measurements at CA1 of a hippocampal slice demonstrates that although no significant changes in a glutamate current is detected by application of 0.052 Hz (test stimuli), a transient change in the current is observed by application of 2 Hz stimulation, indicating enhanced release of L-glutamate in CA1 region (Hozumi et al, 2011). The Lglutamate level in region CA1 at 2 Hz stimulation obtained by in situ calibration ranged from 0.8 to 2.2 M (1.4 M as an average) from 5 independent measurements.…”
Section: Electric Stimulationmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In addition, such interference disappears in the presence of a small amount of L-glutamate . The response to glutamine is significantly modified by using recombinant GluOx (Hozumi et al, 2011). The recombinant GluOx-based sensor suffers interference from glutamine only at high concentration above 300 M, and the response to glutamine is very weak (1.83 pAM an average between 300 and 500 M) in comparison with the response to Lglutamate (472 pA/M).…”
Section: Selectivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is noted that the effect of endogenous L-glutamate on calibrating the implanted sensor is negligible because the basal concentration of endogenous L-glutamate is known to be nM level. 16,17 Thus, the calibration of a patch sensor in an ACSF is valid even for an implanted sensor. For both cases, the integrated currents vs. concentration plots were sigmoid up to 5.0 μM with a half-maximum response (EC50) of ~2.3 μM (regarding the response to 5 μM L-glutamate as the maximum).…”
Section: Calibration Of An Implanted Patch Sensormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Enzyme-based sensors have also been extensively used for in vivo and in vitro monitoring of extracellular L-glutamate [7,26,35,34,39,38,32,17,33]. However, few studies have reported on the simultaneous recording of L-glutamate currents at an enzyme sensor and electrophysiological signals [13,18,16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%